FROLITICKS

Satirical commentary on Canadian and American current political issues

Relations Between Canada and U.S. Are at Their Worst in Many Years

Well, there is little doubt that we start off the New Year with relations between our two countries at their worst in many years. Let’s just summarize some of the issues at hand:

  •  With respect to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), President Trump wants to void the agreement in accordance with his America first policies. Canadian, American and Mexican negotiations are not going well and could break down entirely. In addition, increases in S. duties pertaining to Canadian soft wood imports and Canada’s recent complaint on American trade tariffs to the World Trade Organization, have not helped with the NAFTA talks.  Canada was left no choice in the matter.
  • With respect to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), on which Canada sits as a member, the U.S. is pressuring NATO partners to increase their defence spending as a proportion of the Gross Domestic Product. The U.S. is not happy with Canada’s current defence expenditures, despite Canada’s continuing contribution to the European defence scheme and its past military contributions to Desert Storm and to the war in Afghanistan.
  • On immigration, Canada has seen an increase in refugees crossing its borders from the U.S. because of fears that the Trump administration will end temporary programs — now over ten years old — that accommodated thousands of refugees who had fled natural disasters and violence in their countries. The programs’ termination will affect thousands of refugees from Central America and Haiti. For example, in January 2018, the U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security will decide whether to extend the Temporary Protected Status designation for El Salvador.
  • Trump’s declaration of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and his intention to move the American embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem is in direct contradiction to Canada’s stance which aligns itself with the United Nation’s position. Canada was forced to abstain from a recent UN vote on the American proposition to recognize the above policy. The Trump administration is also threatening to reduce its financial support for the UN and its activities.
  • The Trump administration’s position on ‘climate change’ is in direct opposition to Canada’s position, which along with the rest of the world supports the Paris Climate Agreement of 2015.

These are just a few of the conflicting positions taken by the Trump administration which cause major concerns for the current Canadian government. Ordinary people on both sides of the border remain friends and benefit extensively from the good political and trade relations that have existed for decades.  Canada fought alongside the U.S. in two World Wars, Korea and Afghanistan. Under the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), you have a U.S. and Canadian bi-national organization charged with the missions of aerospace warning and aerospace control for North America. Aerospace warning includes the detection, validation, and warning of attack against North America whether by aircraft, missiles, or space vehicles, through mutual support arrangements with other commands. Canada has cooperated with the U.S. in dealing with major cross-border environmental concerns, including mutual actions to clean up pollution in the Great Lakes and the building and maintenance of the St. Lawrence Seaway.

It’s sad that our neighbour’s government appears to no longer trust us! I firmly believe that the average American, like the average Canadian, still wants to strengthen this important relationship.  Until now, there is little doubt that our close relations have benefited both peoples.  Hopefully, Americans will come to see the potential damage to our relations should the Trump administration’s policies continue down its very rocky road.

Leave a comment »

Things in 2017 That I’d Rather Forget About

As 2017 comes to an end, I look forward with great trepidation and apprehension about what will happen in the New Year. The world appears to be worst off than it was before.  The harsh consequences of climate change appeared regularly while politicians debate whether or not humans are partly responsible for its continued acceleration.  The administration of the world’s largest contributor has buried its head in the sand, preferring to sacrifice the environment on the business alter of multinational corporations.  So sad, so sad, and so dangerous!

The United States and Russia have begun another power struggle, particularly in the Middle East. However, Russia’s President Putin has conveniently cozied up to President Trump by pulling the wool over the latter’s eyes. What a joke! Putin will win another election with any legitimate opposition being silenced, imprisoned or mysteriously murdered!  Meanwhile, the American President continues to fluctuate his support for NATO whenever it suits his mood.  Trump has even managed to piss off Turkey’s regime — a major NATO ally in the Middle East — by proclaiming that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. Any chance for peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians has being stalled for some time to come and violence in the region will continue next year.

North Korea is now a nuclear power, representing a continuing threat to that region. President Trump began a spitting contest with North Korea’s dictator Kim Jong-un, threatening to eradicate North Korea and its people from the face of the earth. In the meantime, Trump’s Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, continues to reinsure our allies that a diplomatic solution is still being sought. With further intercontinental missile launchings by North Korea, the United Nations once again imposed additional trade sanctions on that country — none of which have had much impact up to now. Meanwhile, North Koreans continue to starve and are deprived of many essentials.

Volumes of stories about sexual harassment or assault by American and Canadian celebrities surfaced in the main media and on social media. It all began with allegations by numerous women against renowned Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein. All of a sudden, many other women were encouraged to bring forward their own complaints of sexual harassment against other well known celebrities. Women began to use the hashtag #MeToo on Twitter if they can relate to the disgusting stories of sexual assault, launching a full blown movement in the U.S., Canada and other countries. Indeed, while the result of full disclosure and support is encouraging, the extent to which sexual harassment and assault was disclosed is certainly discouraging and a blight on men everywhere.  Sexual harassment has no place in today’s workplaces, and should never be covered up by employers, no matter who the culprit is.

These are a few of the things that I’d rather forget about this past year, the least of which is the inauguration of another misogynist Donald J. Trump as the American President.  This past year has been a disaster for the American people and many U.S. allies, including Canada. His America-first policies in respect to trade, foreign policy and the environment have created a great deal on unnecessary uncertainty and instability.  As a member of the international community, I do not foresee any great future improvement in these areas of concern.  I can only hope that the American people will wake up to what is happening and exercise their democratic rights to reverse these destructive trends.

 Have a happy New Year everyone, and good luck. You’ll need it!

Leave a comment »

Trump Administration Attempts to Silence Scientists and Others

It’s been reported that the Trump administration has identified seven words that can no longer be used in official budget documents for the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The forbidden words appear to include, “vulnerable,” “entitlement,” “diversity,” “transgender,” “fetus,” “evidence-based,” and “science-based.”  In addition, the Health and Human Services Department (HHS) dropped questions about sexual orientation and gender identity in two recent surveys and has since removed information about LGBTQ Americans from its website. Furthermore, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has gradually erased mentions of “climate change” from government websites, and U.S. national park climate-related tweets were deleted.  There is clear and growing evidence that Donald Trump is trying to muzzle government scientists on a number of major issues by controlling messaging.

It wasn’t that long ago in Canada in 2006 that former Prime Minister Stephen Harper attempted to do something similar. Indeed, scientists from sixteen federal agencies and departments were instructed that all communications with the Canadian public had to first go through the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) for approval.  This raised the ire of the scientific community, especially when it came to addressing issues surrounding climate change, which the former Conservative government argued was not partly human made.  Government scientists could not publicly release science-based reports or speak at scientific forums without prior PMO approval.  By controlling the messaging, Harper was obviously trying to influence the public perspective on key issues for political reasons.

The same is the case in Trump’s administration with its recent edicts to government agencies such as the CDC, HHS and EPA. The control over messaging doesn’t just mean a change in vocabulary, but is also an attempt to make a radical change in the focus of entire agencies.  Now, the views of U.S. government scientists are being similarly altered by controlling who they’re allowed to talk to, what vocabulary they can use and how they can talk about their own research.  It’s a sad state of affairs when politicians attempt to control public views on important environmental, social and health issues through a deliberate form of “mind-control”.  As was the case in Canada, the American scientific community and the public must demonstrate against such attempts as they violate fundamental elements of free speech and the principles of “evidence-based” research.  After all, what comes next after this form of Trumpism?  Perhaps another form of early 1950s “McCarthyism”.  I’m fearful that time will only tell. Unfortunately, too much is at stake!

Leave a comment »

What’s With Trump And The Middle East!

Well, good old wanna-be President Trump announced that the U.S. will recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and will eventually move its embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. This is being done without the support of his NATO allies, including Canada and the European Union. In addition, the move would be in contravention of a United Nations’ resolution on the matter.  While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu naturally praised Trump for the announcement, the Arab League and Arab countries including NATO-ally Turkey, condemned the proposed recognition. Violent demonstrations against the American announcement broke out all over the Middle East and even in Canada. So much for America’s neutral honest broker approach to peace talks between Israelis and the Palestinians!

Not only that, the move has benefited Russian President Vladimir Putin who has made in-roads in establishing greater Russian presence in the Middle East. Timing is everything.  As part of a whirlwind Middle Eastern tour, Putin recently visited Syria, Egypt and Turkey. While President Trump sparked outrage across the region, Putin is playing the role of sober and dependable partner, cozying up to major Arab players in the region.  Although Putin can be blamed for supporting Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, he has declared victory over the Islamic State and announced an imminent drawdown of Russian forces in Syria.  Russia is now seen as becoming more influential in Middle Eastern affairs than compared to a decade ago.  With Trump’s recent declaration of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, such a move will only accelerate the decline of U.S. influence and put an end to any American involvement in peace talks between Israel and the Arab countries.

Once again, as with Trump’s idiotic stance on free trade and multi-lateral trade agreements, the current administration’s erratic and chaotic foreign policy changes will only hurt the perception of U.S. leadership abroad. The ‘Ugly American’ has indeed returned.  Even the U.S. State Department, which includes the Foreign Service, is in terrible disarray. Many key foreign posts have yet to be filled.  Even positions taken by current Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, have often been contradicted by tweets or statements by President Trump.  What a mess!  All the rest of the world can do is watch and wonder aloud.

Leave a comment »

Lost of Community Newspapers Is Sad Day For Free Press

The announcement by the two largest Canadian-based media corporations, Postmedia Network Inc. and Torstar Corp., to close numerous free daily and community newspapers across Canada is certainly a blow to several localities. In the Ottawa region alone, I count up to nine such newspapers on the chopping block. Both companies claim that their deal will result in cost savings and the shut down is primarily due to declines in print advertising revenue.  However, along with several hundred employees loosing their jobs across Ontario, the real pain will be felt by readers within the communities affected. For some, community newspapers offer the main legitimate media source for local news, especially among seniors who may not have access to the Internet or paid dailies.  As most community newspapers are free, they have become an important source of information to those who cannot afford to subscribe to paid dailies or on-line Internet services.

In addition, the existence of a healthy and thriving free press is an essential element of any real democracy. Legitimate media print and other sources provide citizens with information and facts to allow for informed discussion about the issues that affect our communities and nation.  They also provide a real opportunity for the development and training of young journalists and other media staff.  Many young writers who learn to become adult writers got their start in community newspapers.  They have provided a mainstay for education related to investigative journalism, giving the large dailies an inventory of future journalists on the national scale.

Yes, it is estimated that about fifty percent of people get their news, legitimate or fake, from various sources on the Internet. However, a good deal of such news often has not been verified through the traditional means associated with credible and professional journalism.  The news content of such sources cannot be readily verified and the providers cannot really be held accountable.  Their integrity must be questioned, along with the possibility for editorial bias and manipulation of the facts for self-interests.  For the most part, the same cannot be said for legitimate news media, especially in print media.  Who is to hold politicians, organizations, corporations and governments accountable if not the news media?

I’m afraid that the above recent announcement represents another bleak harbinger for the future state of the free press in Canada, and possibly also in the U.S.

Leave a comment »

Sexual Harassment Is Alive But Not So Well In The Corridors of Power

Not since the dismissal in the fall of 2014 of CBC Radio star Jian Ghomeshi for the sexual harassment of several employees has the issue become as explosive as it has in recent weeks. Of course, it all started with allegations of sexual harassment and assault by numerous women against Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein. Now stories by women and men of sexual harassment are coming out the woodwork involving high profiled men in the political, business and entertainment arena.  The notable use of social media has opened up the flood gates.  Countless women and men have rallied around the Twitter hashtag #metoo to reveal their own experiences with sex abuse, including in the workplace, diminishing the associated stigma.

In Canada, the Ghomeshi scandal helped to spur greater provincial protections that are now in effect through several new laws and policies. The changes beefed up provisions against sex harassment and bullying and gave governments the power to order an employer to conduct an impartial investigation when a complaint is made. Companies have also been forced to review and revamp their own policies to comply and are more aggressive in rooting out the problem of sexual harassment in their workplaces.

To date, the same cannot be said for in the U.S., although the federal and state governments will most likely have to deal with the matter in a more transparent and direct manner. After all, according to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, up to 85 percent of American women say that they have been sexually harassed at work. However, only a fraction of those cases are reported, partially due to the professional and legal risks for women who come forward. Nevertheless, women’s advocates are now noting that there appears to be a major ‘cultural and societal shift’ in the works.

In Canada, a 2014 survey by the Angus Reid Institute found that 43 percent of Canadian women had been sexually harassed at work. Unfortunately, the same survey found that men were more likely than women to agree that potentially problematic workplace behaviours were acceptable. In addition, a third of men (34 per cent) believed that sexual harassment in the workplace is “overblown” and receives more attention than it should.  It would appear that a real change in our attitudes about harassment still has a ways to go.  Maybe, just maybe, the recent high profile revelations of sexual misconduct in the U.S. may be enough to potentially lead to some real attitudinal changes. The fact is that everyone is responsible here and must work to stop such an obvious abuse of power.  It’s about time!

Leave a comment »

U.S. Withdrawal From International Climate Change Initiatives Equals Stupidity and Arrogance

A climate report based on work conducted by scientists in 13 U.S. federal agencies, known as the Climate Science Special Report, finds it is “extremely likely” that more than half of the rise in temperatures over the past four decades has been caused by human activity.  Moreover, the same scientists have warned that President Trump’s decision to withdraw the U.S. from the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement could make it difficult, if not impossible, for the world to stay on track to reach an internationally agreed-upon goal for limiting dangerous global warming.  The U.S. is now the only country which is not part of the agreement.

Now, let’s review the facts as presented. The U.S. faces temperature increases of 2.5 degrees Fahrenheit over the next few decades even under significantly reduced future emissions. In addition, the record-setting temperatures of recent years will become relatively common in the near future.  An increase in extreme weather patterns has emerged in recent years, as evidenced by record-breaking hurricanes, droughts, flooding, tornados, snow storms and other weather disasters. Climate change represents the greatest risk to human kind, especially in the most vulnerable communities where people are suffering from poverty, water scarcity, food shortages, inadequate housing or other crises.

Climate change denial and downplaying the impact of greenhouse-gas emissions on the climate is nothing less than stupid and arrogant. The American repeal of domestic actions resulting in halting the decline in U.S. emissions will likely make it more difficult and costly to meet the Paris agreement temperature goal of holding warming well below 2°C, and limiting it to 1.5°C.  Indeed, we may have already reached the point of no return.  Without American involvement and support — representing 40% of the world’s wealth — there is a real danger of other countries pulling out of the agreement.  Climate policy experts note that U.S. emissions cuts were set to make up a major part — more than a fifth — of the reductions envisioned under the Paris accord between now and 2030.

What makes the situation even more crazy is that numerous U.S. states, individual cities and major American corporations have banded together in a move to stabilize U.S. emissions, no matter what the Trump administration does on the federal level. It can only be hoped that the Trump administration comes to its senses and gets off its high horse.  Otherwise, every indication is that the future climate will look even bleaker than it already does.  Everyone is affected, and no one will be spared the consequences.

Leave a comment »

Is There A Russian Under Many Beds in Washington?

Well, things are certainly coming to the surface in Washington in light of charges being laid by the Justice Department resulting from the investigation into whether Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia to influence the 2016 election. The investigation is being led by former FBI director Robert Mueller.  Remember him.  He was named special counsel to oversee the investigation earlier in 2017.  At the time, the appointment was considered as a victory for Democrats and a handful of Republicans who had called for a special prosecutor or independent commission to conduct the inquiry.  President Trump however called the whole initiative a “witch hunt” perpetuated by the Democrats to undermine the presidential election outcome.

However, it would appear that Mr. Mueller has taken his investigation very seriously. Now, we see the White House trying to distance itself from those who participated on Trump’s campaign committee.  All the tweeting in the world may not make this issue disappear, particularly as the conclusions of the investigation are far from over.  It’s just one other major distraction for the Trump Administration.

Trump has to be very careful in how he deals with the special prosecutor. He doesn’t want a repeat of the infamous ousting of FBI director James Comey in order to shut down an investigation into Trump’s former national security adviser, Michael Flynn.  Trump’s firing of Comey set off its own wave of alarm.  Comey’s firing was even openly criticized by Stephen K. Bannon as a major mistake .

There is little doubt that the Russians favoured Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, especially Vladimir Putin. Numerous Trump supporters and campaigners have had direct dealings with the Russians in the past, including President Trump.  It is increasingly obvious that the Russians attempted to interfere in the last election. Especially since Facebook, Twitter and Google have now acknowledged to U.S. lawmakers that Russian-linked accounts began exploiting their services in 2015 to sway last year’s presidential election. Remember that it’s already illegal for Russians and other foreigners to pay for U.S. political ads. Millions of American voters — half of Americans get their news from social media — saw these ads which in many cases posted “fake news” or falsified facts about Hillary Clinton.

Members of Trump’s campaign team admitted to meeting with Russian officials prior to and during the election. I look forward to what Mr. Mueller’s investigation will reveal down the road.  Maybe there is a Russian under many beds in Washington!

Leave a comment »

Tweet, Tweet – Guess Who? Trump is on Twitter Again!

When will President Trump stop tweeting his nonsensical assertions? His latest tweets had to do with whether former Presidents contacted the families of fallen soldiers, Hurricane Maria’s effect on Puerto Rico, the Democrats holding up judicial nominees, the overall tax burden in the United States compared to other industrialized countries, as well as dozens of other topics. Now, using twitter might not be so bad but for all the inaccuracies, falsehoods and factual errors. A follow-up of Trump’s assertions usually shows up his ignorance of the facts and the use of Twitter to promote his views and personal attacks on others who have the gall to criticize him publicly.

Unfortunately, Trump’s tweets appear to be followed blindly by his supporters who view his assertions as something on par with gospel. Talk about false news! At least legitimate news media expressly disclose such journalistic views as editorial opinion. What Trump has yet to realize is that what comes out of the Oval Office, no matter in what format, is taken as representing his administration’s policies. What is also disconcerting is the continuous display of administration officials being hauled out to interpret what Trump is actually saying in each tweet. I’m getting a little annoyed when officials declare that the President was only joking. There is nothing to joke about North Korea, health care, gun control, etc., etc.

Moreover, it is almost impossible to make sensible assertions in 140 characters or less. Trump firmly believes that he would not be President without Twitter, regularly using Twitter to mount vigorous attacks on political opponents, news outlets and people who have criticized him.  Indeed, one can argue that the extensive use of this social-media platform represents a very dangerous precedent.  Trump believes that he can bypass what he labels unfair media coverage by speaking directly through social media. The primary problem is that, unlike in other legitimate news media, there is no initial confirmation of what is being asserted is actually backed by established facts and valid sources.

What does this do to democratic debate and the role of truth with respect to positions normally backed by study and defensible facts? Americans and others need to take a hard look at how social media is being manipulated as a political tool.  Otherwise, this President and future leaders will continue to abuse their office in order to achieve political gains at the expense of the truth.

Leave a comment »

Trump’s Plan to Decertify the Iran Nuclear Deal Leaves Republicans in the Lurch

President Trump has argued that under the Iran nuclear deal signed in 2015, Iran has not “lived up” to the spirit of the deal. This despite the fact that by all accounts — even that of the U.S. — Iran had lived up to its commitments under the agreement. In addition, European leaders have stated that they were not interested in expanding the scope of its implementation. Other countries that are party to the deal — Britain, France, Germany, Russia, China and Iran —argued that the agreement was designed to address issues solely related to Iran’s nuclear program, and not other issues that Trump has raised in the past.

Now, Trump is expected to decertify the deal which would kick the matter over to the Republican controlled Congress, which in turn would then have 60 days to determine how to proceed and whether to re-impose sanctions. The only problem is that the majority of Republicans have little appetite to reopen the 2015 deal, backed by the Democrats in Congress. The Republicans want to avoid a crisis and don’t want to kill the agreement which would leave them with the blame both at home and abroad. Once again, the President and Republicans are at loggerheads, with the party split between the so-called hawks and doves.

The situation with Iran is a lot more different than it was ten years ago. After all, it is in Iraq, where fighting the Islamic State (ISIS) has most conspicuously brought the U.S into a tacit alliance with Iran, that a more hostile relationship between Tehran and Washington could prove most consequential. Iranian-backed militias are deeply embedded in the overall Iraqi effort to wrest back territory from the militants, one that is also being aided by the United States.  Today, Iran commands the loyalties of tens of thousands in allied militias and proxy armies that are fighting on the front lines in Syria, Iraq and Yemen with armored vehicles, tanks and heavy weapons.  Exactly what the Trump administration intends to do about a state of affairs that has already become deeply entrenched is unclear.  So pervasive is Iran’s presence across the region that it is hard to see how any U.S. administration could easily roll it back without destabilizing allies, endangering Americans, undermining the war against the ISIS and upsetting the new regional balance.

The Iran nuclear deal is only one part of the foreign policy equation in the Middle East. To date, the deal has succeeded in stabilizing relations with Iran as it pertains to the nuclear weapons issue. Trump will have to spell out a broader strategy for confronting Iran, including its ballistic missile program and alleged support for terror networks in the Middle East. Decertifying and reopening the deal will not help matters, and may even destabilize relations with Iran who has become a major ally in the fight against ISIS. Without a doubt, the President’s move will present Congress with another hot potato and, once again, undermine America’s credibility to uphold its commitments with its allies and partners.

Leave a comment »