FROLITICKS

Satirical commentary on Canadian and American current political issues

U.S. Withdrawal From International Climate Change Initiatives Equals Stupidity and Arrogance

A climate report based on work conducted by scientists in 13 U.S. federal agencies, known as the Climate Science Special Report, finds it is “extremely likely” that more than half of the rise in temperatures over the past four decades has been caused by human activity.  Moreover, the same scientists have warned that President Trump’s decision to withdraw the U.S. from the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement could make it difficult, if not impossible, for the world to stay on track to reach an internationally agreed-upon goal for limiting dangerous global warming.  The U.S. is now the only country which is not part of the agreement.

Now, let’s review the facts as presented. The U.S. faces temperature increases of 2.5 degrees Fahrenheit over the next few decades even under significantly reduced future emissions. In addition, the record-setting temperatures of recent years will become relatively common in the near future.  An increase in extreme weather patterns has emerged in recent years, as evidenced by record-breaking hurricanes, droughts, flooding, tornados, snow storms and other weather disasters. Climate change represents the greatest risk to human kind, especially in the most vulnerable communities where people are suffering from poverty, water scarcity, food shortages, inadequate housing or other crises.

Climate change denial and downplaying the impact of greenhouse-gas emissions on the climate is nothing less than stupid and arrogant. The American repeal of domestic actions resulting in halting the decline in U.S. emissions will likely make it more difficult and costly to meet the Paris agreement temperature goal of holding warming well below 2°C, and limiting it to 1.5°C.  Indeed, we may have already reached the point of no return.  Without American involvement and support — representing 40% of the world’s wealth — there is a real danger of other countries pulling out of the agreement.  Climate policy experts note that U.S. emissions cuts were set to make up a major part — more than a fifth — of the reductions envisioned under the Paris accord between now and 2030.

What makes the situation even more crazy is that numerous U.S. states, individual cities and major American corporations have banded together in a move to stabilize U.S. emissions, no matter what the Trump administration does on the federal level. It can only be hoped that the Trump administration comes to its senses and gets off its high horse.  Otherwise, every indication is that the future climate will look even bleaker than it already does.  Everyone is affected, and no one will be spared the consequences.

Leave a comment »

Is There A Russian Under Many Beds in Washington?

Well, things are certainly coming to the surface in Washington in light of charges being laid by the Justice Department resulting from the investigation into whether Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia to influence the 2016 election. The investigation is being led by former FBI director Robert Mueller.  Remember him.  He was named special counsel to oversee the investigation earlier in 2017.  At the time, the appointment was considered as a victory for Democrats and a handful of Republicans who had called for a special prosecutor or independent commission to conduct the inquiry.  President Trump however called the whole initiative a “witch hunt” perpetuated by the Democrats to undermine the presidential election outcome.

However, it would appear that Mr. Mueller has taken his investigation very seriously. Now, we see the White House trying to distance itself from those who participated on Trump’s campaign committee.  All the tweeting in the world may not make this issue disappear, particularly as the conclusions of the investigation are far from over.  It’s just one other major distraction for the Trump Administration.

Trump has to be very careful in how he deals with the special prosecutor. He doesn’t want a repeat of the infamous ousting of FBI director James Comey in order to shut down an investigation into Trump’s former national security adviser, Michael Flynn.  Trump’s firing of Comey set off its own wave of alarm.  Comey’s firing was even openly criticized by Stephen K. Bannon as a major mistake .

There is little doubt that the Russians favoured Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, especially Vladimir Putin. Numerous Trump supporters and campaigners have had direct dealings with the Russians in the past, including President Trump.  It is increasingly obvious that the Russians attempted to interfere in the last election. Especially since Facebook, Twitter and Google have now acknowledged to U.S. lawmakers that Russian-linked accounts began exploiting their services in 2015 to sway last year’s presidential election. Remember that it’s already illegal for Russians and other foreigners to pay for U.S. political ads. Millions of American voters — half of Americans get their news from social media — saw these ads which in many cases posted “fake news” or falsified facts about Hillary Clinton.

Members of Trump’s campaign team admitted to meeting with Russian officials prior to and during the election. I look forward to what Mr. Mueller’s investigation will reveal down the road.  Maybe there is a Russian under many beds in Washington!

Leave a comment »

Tweet, Tweet – Guess Who? Trump is on Twitter Again!

When will President Trump stop tweeting his nonsensical assertions? His latest tweets had to do with whether former Presidents contacted the families of fallen soldiers, Hurricane Maria’s effect on Puerto Rico, the Democrats holding up judicial nominees, the overall tax burden in the United States compared to other industrialized countries, as well as dozens of other topics. Now, using twitter might not be so bad but for all the inaccuracies, falsehoods and factual errors. A follow-up of Trump’s assertions usually shows up his ignorance of the facts and the use of Twitter to promote his views and personal attacks on others who have the gall to criticize him publicly.

Unfortunately, Trump’s tweets appear to be followed blindly by his supporters who view his assertions as something on par with gospel. Talk about false news! At least legitimate news media expressly disclose such journalistic views as editorial opinion. What Trump has yet to realize is that what comes out of the Oval Office, no matter in what format, is taken as representing his administration’s policies. What is also disconcerting is the continuous display of administration officials being hauled out to interpret what Trump is actually saying in each tweet. I’m getting a little annoyed when officials declare that the President was only joking. There is nothing to joke about North Korea, health care, gun control, etc., etc.

Moreover, it is almost impossible to make sensible assertions in 140 characters or less. Trump firmly believes that he would not be President without Twitter, regularly using Twitter to mount vigorous attacks on political opponents, news outlets and people who have criticized him.  Indeed, one can argue that the extensive use of this social-media platform represents a very dangerous precedent.  Trump believes that he can bypass what he labels unfair media coverage by speaking directly through social media. The primary problem is that, unlike in other legitimate news media, there is no initial confirmation of what is being asserted is actually backed by established facts and valid sources.

What does this do to democratic debate and the role of truth with respect to positions normally backed by study and defensible facts? Americans and others need to take a hard look at how social media is being manipulated as a political tool.  Otherwise, this President and future leaders will continue to abuse their office in order to achieve political gains at the expense of the truth.

Leave a comment »

Trump’s Plan to Decertify the Iran Nuclear Deal Leaves Republicans in the Lurch

President Trump has argued that under the Iran nuclear deal signed in 2015, Iran has not “lived up” to the spirit of the deal. This despite the fact that by all accounts — even that of the U.S. — Iran had lived up to its commitments under the agreement. In addition, European leaders have stated that they were not interested in expanding the scope of its implementation. Other countries that are party to the deal — Britain, France, Germany, Russia, China and Iran —argued that the agreement was designed to address issues solely related to Iran’s nuclear program, and not other issues that Trump has raised in the past.

Now, Trump is expected to decertify the deal which would kick the matter over to the Republican controlled Congress, which in turn would then have 60 days to determine how to proceed and whether to re-impose sanctions. The only problem is that the majority of Republicans have little appetite to reopen the 2015 deal, backed by the Democrats in Congress. The Republicans want to avoid a crisis and don’t want to kill the agreement which would leave them with the blame both at home and abroad. Once again, the President and Republicans are at loggerheads, with the party split between the so-called hawks and doves.

The situation with Iran is a lot more different than it was ten years ago. After all, it is in Iraq, where fighting the Islamic State (ISIS) has most conspicuously brought the U.S into a tacit alliance with Iran, that a more hostile relationship between Tehran and Washington could prove most consequential. Iranian-backed militias are deeply embedded in the overall Iraqi effort to wrest back territory from the militants, one that is also being aided by the United States.  Today, Iran commands the loyalties of tens of thousands in allied militias and proxy armies that are fighting on the front lines in Syria, Iraq and Yemen with armored vehicles, tanks and heavy weapons.  Exactly what the Trump administration intends to do about a state of affairs that has already become deeply entrenched is unclear.  So pervasive is Iran’s presence across the region that it is hard to see how any U.S. administration could easily roll it back without destabilizing allies, endangering Americans, undermining the war against the ISIS and upsetting the new regional balance.

The Iran nuclear deal is only one part of the foreign policy equation in the Middle East. To date, the deal has succeeded in stabilizing relations with Iran as it pertains to the nuclear weapons issue. Trump will have to spell out a broader strategy for confronting Iran, including its ballistic missile program and alleged support for terror networks in the Middle East. Decertifying and reopening the deal will not help matters, and may even destabilize relations with Iran who has become a major ally in the fight against ISIS. Without a doubt, the President’s move will present Congress with another hot potato and, once again, undermine America’s credibility to uphold its commitments with its allies and partners.

Leave a comment »

Free Trade Versus Protective Policies and Where Is Trump Going On This?

As part of his campaign, President Trump stated time and time again that he wanted to either renegotiate trade agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) involving Canada and Mexico or withdraw from negotiations involving future agreements such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Well, Trump withdrew from his predecessor’s signature TPP trade deal on his first full weekday in office, leaving the 11 other countries that had negotiated the pact to wonder if years of work had just gone down the drain. Currently, NAFTA negotiations are taking place with a ridiculous December 2017 deadline to complete a new deal.

The problem is that trade today involves a global economy with integrated production and services of multinational corporations around the world. Trump’s attempt to introduce protective policies is most likely going to hurt American corporations as much as foreign enterprises and workers.  In order to be competitive, American corporations now rely heavily on goods, services and component production found in other countries.  In the case of NAFTA, those in the U.S. vastly underestimate the important trading relationship most of the 50 states hold with Canada. Indeed, 35 American states trade more with Canada than any other country. Currently, some 70 percent of Canada’s trade is with the U.S. — the majority of which benefits both countries. NAFTA has also benefited Mexico economically in various ways and those American states bordering Mexico.

American, Mexican and Canadian consumers benefit through access to more and cheaper goods and services, as evidenced by the number of American retail outlets operating in Mexico and Canada. With NAFTA, we have evolved into a continental economy, with improvements for labour and the environment — particularly in Mexico as a result of side agreements. What’s interesting is that the Republicans have always been the defenders and promoters of free trade in Congress and the White House, as were leaders of the Conservative Party in Canada. Ironically, we now have a Liberal Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, who is promoting the benefits of free trade for all three countries.

Yes, there are things that can be improved in NAFTA since its implementation almost thirty years ago. World economies have changed a lot since then, particularly with new technologies. However, most experts believe that its benefits to all three countries far outweigh its costs. Other factors, such as new innovations in communications, energy and robotics have had a greater impact on the labour market and the environment than trade agreements. Simply introducing more protective policies will not change or stop the consequences of rapid innovation in the manufacturing, service, finance and other sectors. Punishing countries through protective policies will simply hurt everyone involved. Such policies don’t only go against the changing realities of our times, but also against common sense.

Leave a comment »

Who Likes A Military Parade More Than Donald Trump?

Like the old saying, everyone loves a parade. Indeed, it would appear from all reports (including fake news) that President Trump would love to see a military parade down Pennsylvania Avenue displaying the military might of the U.S.A.  He apparently got the idea from watching the Bastille Day parade in Paris with President Emmanuel Macron of France last July.  He is said to have called it “one of the most beautiful parades I have ever seen”— jet planes flying overhead and tanks and other armoured vehicles rolling along, with hundreds, if not thousands, of military personnel marching along to inspirational patriotic band music.  Trump reportedly said that “We are going to have to try and top it.”

And why not? After all, North Korea, Russia and China display their military hardware in parades all the time.  Just imagine Donald Trump standing proudly on the viewing stand in a Mussolini-style pose while smiling ear-to-ear at the display of American military prowess. Never mind the cost of such an event, which would be in the millions of tax-payer dollars at a time when the feds are running huge deficits.  Just imagine the great publicity shots and huge crowds, even larger than those attending his inaugural parade.  When to do it?  Well, how about next Fourth of July!  Americans have not witnessed a major military parade down the streets of Washington since 1991 when President George Bush hosted a limited military parade after the end of the Persian Gulf war.  That display was somewhat cheap as it only cost a little more than a pitiful $12 million U.S.  Surely, Trump can do better than that!

As the Commander-in-Chief, President Trump deserves to have his parade to display the American military might for all the world to see, including the North Koreans and Russians. We’ll see who has the biggest and most powerful missiles — Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin or Kim Jong-un. Needless-to-say, I imagine that the Americans would win the bragging rights.  So go ahead, President Trump.  Spend those hard-earned tax dollars and have your little parade if it makes you happy.  I’m sure we’ll all be watching with either great anticipation or even greater unease.

Leave a comment »

Hurricanes, Droughts and Forest Fires Attest to Issues Regarding Climate Change

First there was Hurricane Harvey, and now there is Hurricane Irma — the worst in recorded history. Forest fires now cover nine U.S. states and have ravished the Canadian province of British Columbia. Around the world, annual temperatures have consistently increased, leaving havoc, rising waters and scorched earth in their wake.  Yet, here we have a President of the world’s most powerful country arguing that climate change is not an issue!  Some people argue about economics, but the recovery from damages caused by Hurricane Harvey in the U.S. is already estimated to cost over 180 Billion dollars (U.S.). The damages from forest fires and to crops are estimated to be in the billions of dollars.

For the human race to sit back and not do anything to deal with climate change is ludicrous to say the least. Sticking one’s head in the proverbial sand and ignoring the socioeconomic impact and scientific evidence related to climate change doesn’t make any sense!  What we need is leadership, both national and international.  Simply coping with the consequences is no longer a viable alternative, no matter how much leaders brag about their response to these calamities.  The fact is that people parish and people loose everything.

The U.S. consumes forty percent of the earth’s resources. It has a responsibility to do so in an environmental friendly and responsible way.  Without American proactive and aggressive actions in dealing with climate change, international initiatives may be meaningless.  It’s time for President Trump and Congress to recognize this reality.  Policies need to be changed now.  It’s taken decades to arrive at this point, and it will probably take years to tackle the issues pertaining to climate change.  Our climate supersedes the economy.  Mankind cannot believe that matters surrounding the earth’s climate are secondary in nature.  The state of our planet is first and foremost the most important consideration that we should have.  Let’s hold our leaders accountable.

Leave a comment »

What Is It With Trump And All These Post-Election Rallies?

Someone should tell President Trump that the electioneering should have been over last November. However, once again Trump is planning to continue holding rallies to arouse the masses.  For example, Trump is pressing forward with plans for a large-scale political rally next week in Phoenix, Arizona, despite pleas from the city’s mayor and other officials not to hold a polarizing event while feelings remain so raw over the recent violence in Charlottesville, Virginia. These are not presidential events to officially announce or promote new legislative initiatives because there are none.

Last November, I blogged that I couldn’t help but compare Donald Trump with the former Italian dictator Benito Mussolini. Mussolini loved rallies and military parades, with his black shirted supporters marching in step to patriotic music and shouting nonsensical slogans.  Now, I’m not saying that Trump’s supporters at these rallies are fascists.  However, let me quote from my earlier blog: “Mussolini had quickly gained a reputation for his magnetism and remarkable rhetorical talents, inspiring large disenchanted crowds with populist slogans. Trump adeptly worked his campaign rhetoric to galvanize his supporters at large orchestrated gatherings.”  As an extreme narcissist, Trump appears to need regular reassurance that some Americans still adore and support him, including apparently the white supremacists whom he refuses to condemn in no uncertain terms.

What’s with all these continuing rallies? There are no mid-term elections at this time.  If there were, I’m not too sure that very many Republican candidates would want Trump’s support at this time.  The GOP appear to be in disarray following the failure to pass their proposed health care legislation and to end so-called Obamacare.  The White House is in a mess with even the house rats fleeing the premises.  Trump’s staff still spend most of their time trying to clarify what the President’s actual position is on a number of important current issues, not always succeeding to do so.

Instead of parading around the country seeking reaffirmation of his popularity, which is now at an all time low, Trump should spend more time in Washington. He needs to mend fences with Congress, his Cabinet and what’s left of his original staff.  What Americans don’t need are more rallies.  What Americans are looking for is clear and unifying leadership from their president and his administration.  No more off-the-cuff meanderings.  No more divisive speeches full of historical inaccuracies and bombastic statements.  Either be president for all Americans, or resign and let someone else provide the essential leadership needed to tackle the critical issues that America and the world face. Then and only then can one begin to talk about “making America great again”!

Leave a comment »

White Supremacists Movements Should Be Outlawed In North America

The recent march of white supremacists in city of Charlottesville, Virginia again highlights the dangers of extreme movements of such hate groups who attack people based on their colour, religion and ethnicity. Such movements have no place in today’s multicultural societies in the U.S. or Canada.  They attract groups like the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazis and movement leaders like David Duke and Richard Spencer.  They align themselves with grotesque Nazi and KKK doctrines.  Unfortunately, while President Trump condemned the bloody protests, he did not specifically criticize the white nationalist rally and its neo-Nazi slogans, blaming “hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides.”

The KKK and other white supremacists movements have also existed in Canada since the 1800s, only to emerge more recently under other names, including the Western Guard and the Canadian National Socialist Party. Unfortunately, such groups recruit disenchanted young whites and prey on the growing anti-immigrant sentiment in parts of the United States and Canada. In the U.S., white supremacists appear to have been galvanized by promises of Donald Trump to “take our country back”. Many of the white nationalist protesters often carry campaign signs for Mr. Trump.  Although Trump appears to condemn the violence associated with the movement, he seems to be reluctant to condemn such movements in stronger terms — perhaps out of a reluctance to upset those who have supported him publicly.

Experts note that while some white supremacists have engaged in random acts of violence, others have carried out targeted attacks on Muslims, Jews, people of colour, aboriginals and LGBTQ people. While security agencies acknowledge the presence of right-wing extremists, they don’t appear to be a high priority.  Governments perceive such groups as being fragmented and primarily posing a threat to public order and not to national security.  There is also a reluctance to interfere in their activities due to apparent concerns with violating their freedom of speech.  Instead, the authorities simply react to specific incidents which may violate criminal , hate and civil rights laws.

Maybe it’s time that we not only condemn “white supremacists” associated historically with violence against citizens in both our countries. To say that they are just “pro-white, and not anti-anybody” is a farce. The basic premise of the movement is to promote hatred, exclusion and white supremacy.  Their continuing affiliation with KKK and Nazi beliefs confirms their reliance on national extremism of the worst kind.  It is time now that the governments of both countries seriously consider outlawing their existence, while protecting legitimate and peaceful freedom of expression. White supremacist movements have no place in today’s society, especially given their self-evident continuing and unacceptable promotion of hatred.

 

Leave a comment »

Trump Administration Cuts to Workplace Health & Safety Programs Hurts Workers

The Bureau of Labor Statistics recently reported that nearly 5,000 workers were killed on the job in the United States in 2015. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), an agency within the U.S. Labor Department, oversees workplace safety in most sectors. Another agency within the Labor Department, the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), oversees health and safety within the nation’s most dangerous mines. However, under President Trump, both agencies are under attack. The Trump administration and lawmakers seem to be making good on commitments to roll back occupational health and safety (OHS) regulations on businesses. Both OSHA and the MSHA appear to be prime targets. OSHA is expected to see a major cut to its budget which most likely will result in fewer safety inspectors to do enforcement and proactive work.

This year alone, deaths in U.S. coal mines with ten coal miners killed to date, have surged ahead of last year’s total. The United Mine Workers of America says agency initiatives fall short, noting that federal inspectors who conduct such mine visits are now barred from punishing the owner if they spot safety violations. A number of the government’s Cabinet agencies would see significant budget cuts under the President’s proposal. One of the biggest losers is the Department of Labor.  In the last few months there have been several instances in which workplace safety decisions have been revisited by the Trump administration, with a number of health and safety rules and standards being challenged or overturned.

As an admirer of past U.S. health and safety initiatives, including excellent research undertaken by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the administration’s attacks on these agencies represent a regressive display of terrible policies. There has been great progress in the fields of OHS in recent years, with the U.S. leading the way. For example, the NIOSH WorkLife Initiative is intended as a guide for employers and employer-employee partnerships wishing to establish effective workplace programs that sustain and improve worker health. Workplace injury rates had been declining in recent years as a result primarily of OSHA and MSHA enforcement and education programs.

However, work-related fatalities and injuries are still far too high in the U.S. and elsewhere. Reducing the capabilities of health and safety agencies to do their jobs isn’t going to help matters.  OSHA and the MSHA have worked closely with employer, labour and professional organizations to implement reasonable and cooperative policies and programs.  Yes, there are costs for employers to comply with OHS laws, but there are also direct costs to the country, workers and their families as a result of workplace fatalities and injuries.  In this day and age, there is no reason for a worker not to expect to leave for work in the morning and to return safely at the end of the day.  After all, these are fathers and mothers, sons and daughters, brothers and sisters.  Failure to protect all workers and to go after the bad actors will cost us all in the long run!

Leave a comment »