FROLITICKS

Satirical commentary on Canadian and American current political issues

The “#MeToo” Phenomenon Has Opened the Flood Gates

There is little doubt that claims of sexual harassment in social media have caught the attention of the mainstream media, a number of which are sensational in nature. Now, across the U.S. and Canada, claims of sexual harassment by women and men have been flooding in against politicians, actors, producers, musicians, athletes, trainers, etc., etc. Some claims go back decades, and some are more recent — most frequently involving persons in positions of power. Women in particular have been encouraged by other women and women’s groups to come forward with allegations of past sexual misconduct or assault.  However, in many cases, charges under criminal law have never been laid by the authorities, and often claims were never brought forward by the victims.  Too often, the victims were victimized by the system.  Regularly, it has become a matter of his word against the victim’s word.

Unfortunately, all that one needs to do now is to make accusations via a tweet, e-mail or other social media source. Once out there, such accusations land in the so-called “court of public opinion”.  Moreover, no one has been found guilty in a court of law or accountable by some form of “due process”.  As a result, without further independent investigation, careers can be destroyed and reputations ruined.  Many of the accusations can be found in work-related situations where there may not be any credible, objective and confidential process in place to determine the validity of harassment charges.  Only in recent years have employers been required either by law or through internal policies to institute review processes when harassment claims are made.

However, it appears that both public sector and private sector employers have not been diligent in ensuring that harassment investigation processes are functioning well. Too often, it takes a scandal to become public to bring such inadequacies to the surface.  This situation is no longer acceptable as evidenced by the public’s and shareholders’ outrage.  As well, individuals being openly accused of sexual harassment are being forced to immediately step down from their positions with no access to due process.  As for the alleged victims, one sees increasingly a public “backlash” against some when accusations are simply made through social media without verification as to their validity.  What is now being portrayed as sexual harassment has become so broad that people are beginning to demand greater clarification as to its meaning, and rightly so.

Don’t get me wrong. The fact that the issue of sexual harassment in the workplace has been raised through both social and mainstream media is a good thing.  However, there is obviously a real need for employers to quickly react in positive ways so as to prevent future claims of harassment and to protect employees in their workplaces.  Independent, confidential and just processes must be in place to ensure fairness for both the accuser and the accused.  We’ve seen what happens when unsubstantiated accusations become public.  Indeed, we live in very thorny times.

Leave a comment »

Another U.S. Government Shutdown — Is This Anyway to Run a Country?

Well, here we go again! The U.S. federal government is shut down once again, leaving hundreds of thousands of Americans without access to government services across the country and thousands of civil servants without pay. It all seems rather incredulous!  Congress couldn’t agree on a budget needed to keep the government running.  As in the past, Washington politics is playing its usual role. Too often, non-budget related policies are tied into budgetary proceedings, with both federal parties attempting to coerce the other party to support certain political positions.

One could not see this happening in Canada which operates under a parliamentary system. Every year, the Government tables a budget for the following year which is then reviewed in advance by a finance committee in both the House of Commons and the Senate.  Now, the passage of budget bills is considered as a ‘vote of confidence’ in Parliament for the ruling party.  Majority governments normally have little problem passing budgets between elections.  However, in the case of minority governments, failure to secure sufficient votes from the opposition parties will lead to the dissolution of Parliament.  If the opposition parties can agree, they could subsequently form a coalition government.  If not, an election has to be called.  In the interim, the government continues to operate until a new ruling government is formed post-election.  Most importantly, the budgetary process is carried out in an atmosphere of decorum based on past conventions.

The American process on the other hand is carried out with a great deal of incivility by both parties, and in today’s climate by the President. Attempting to garner public support for their position, Congressional parties and the President are blaming the other side for the shut down.  Instead of debating matters in Congress, both sides argue their positions in the main and social media.  The entire process becomes an unruly mess.  What’s worst, Senators and House Representatives continue to be paid, while government workers have to wait to be paid once the shut down is over.  Several social, health and environmental protection services are affected during the duration of any shut down.  Examples of such services are too many to list here.  Unlike under Canada’s parliamentary system, there do not appear to be any real consequences for the governing party in Congress — each vying for political points. Maybe, it’s time to take a non-partisan look at the current budgetary processes.  Otherwise, the American public will have to again endure future government shut downs.

Leave a comment »

Is There A Russian Under Many Beds in Washington?

Well, things are certainly coming to the surface in Washington in light of charges being laid by the Justice Department resulting from the investigation into whether Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia to influence the 2016 election. The investigation is being led by former FBI director Robert Mueller.  Remember him.  He was named special counsel to oversee the investigation earlier in 2017.  At the time, the appointment was considered as a victory for Democrats and a handful of Republicans who had called for a special prosecutor or independent commission to conduct the inquiry.  President Trump however called the whole initiative a “witch hunt” perpetuated by the Democrats to undermine the presidential election outcome.

However, it would appear that Mr. Mueller has taken his investigation very seriously. Now, we see the White House trying to distance itself from those who participated on Trump’s campaign committee.  All the tweeting in the world may not make this issue disappear, particularly as the conclusions of the investigation are far from over.  It’s just one other major distraction for the Trump Administration.

Trump has to be very careful in how he deals with the special prosecutor. He doesn’t want a repeat of the infamous ousting of FBI director James Comey in order to shut down an investigation into Trump’s former national security adviser, Michael Flynn.  Trump’s firing of Comey set off its own wave of alarm.  Comey’s firing was even openly criticized by Stephen K. Bannon as a major mistake .

There is little doubt that the Russians favoured Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, especially Vladimir Putin. Numerous Trump supporters and campaigners have had direct dealings with the Russians in the past, including President Trump.  It is increasingly obvious that the Russians attempted to interfere in the last election. Especially since Facebook, Twitter and Google have now acknowledged to U.S. lawmakers that Russian-linked accounts began exploiting their services in 2015 to sway last year’s presidential election. Remember that it’s already illegal for Russians and other foreigners to pay for U.S. political ads. Millions of American voters — half of Americans get their news from social media — saw these ads which in many cases posted “fake news” or falsified facts about Hillary Clinton.

Members of Trump’s campaign team admitted to meeting with Russian officials prior to and during the election. I look forward to what Mr. Mueller’s investigation will reveal down the road.  Maybe there is a Russian under many beds in Washington!

Leave a comment »

Tweet, Tweet – Guess Who? Trump is on Twitter Again!

When will President Trump stop tweeting his nonsensical assertions? His latest tweets had to do with whether former Presidents contacted the families of fallen soldiers, Hurricane Maria’s effect on Puerto Rico, the Democrats holding up judicial nominees, the overall tax burden in the United States compared to other industrialized countries, as well as dozens of other topics. Now, using twitter might not be so bad but for all the inaccuracies, falsehoods and factual errors. A follow-up of Trump’s assertions usually shows up his ignorance of the facts and the use of Twitter to promote his views and personal attacks on others who have the gall to criticize him publicly.

Unfortunately, Trump’s tweets appear to be followed blindly by his supporters who view his assertions as something on par with gospel. Talk about false news! At least legitimate news media expressly disclose such journalistic views as editorial opinion. What Trump has yet to realize is that what comes out of the Oval Office, no matter in what format, is taken as representing his administration’s policies. What is also disconcerting is the continuous display of administration officials being hauled out to interpret what Trump is actually saying in each tweet. I’m getting a little annoyed when officials declare that the President was only joking. There is nothing to joke about North Korea, health care, gun control, etc., etc.

Moreover, it is almost impossible to make sensible assertions in 140 characters or less. Trump firmly believes that he would not be President without Twitter, regularly using Twitter to mount vigorous attacks on political opponents, news outlets and people who have criticized him.  Indeed, one can argue that the extensive use of this social-media platform represents a very dangerous precedent.  Trump believes that he can bypass what he labels unfair media coverage by speaking directly through social media. The primary problem is that, unlike in other legitimate news media, there is no initial confirmation of what is being asserted is actually backed by established facts and valid sources.

What does this do to democratic debate and the role of truth with respect to positions normally backed by study and defensible facts? Americans and others need to take a hard look at how social media is being manipulated as a political tool.  Otherwise, this President and future leaders will continue to abuse their office in order to achieve political gains at the expense of the truth.

Leave a comment »

What Is It With Trump And All These Post-Election Rallies?

Someone should tell President Trump that the electioneering should have been over last November. However, once again Trump is planning to continue holding rallies to arouse the masses.  For example, Trump is pressing forward with plans for a large-scale political rally next week in Phoenix, Arizona, despite pleas from the city’s mayor and other officials not to hold a polarizing event while feelings remain so raw over the recent violence in Charlottesville, Virginia. These are not presidential events to officially announce or promote new legislative initiatives because there are none.

Last November, I blogged that I couldn’t help but compare Donald Trump with the former Italian dictator Benito Mussolini. Mussolini loved rallies and military parades, with his black shirted supporters marching in step to patriotic music and shouting nonsensical slogans.  Now, I’m not saying that Trump’s supporters at these rallies are fascists.  However, let me quote from my earlier blog: “Mussolini had quickly gained a reputation for his magnetism and remarkable rhetorical talents, inspiring large disenchanted crowds with populist slogans. Trump adeptly worked his campaign rhetoric to galvanize his supporters at large orchestrated gatherings.”  As an extreme narcissist, Trump appears to need regular reassurance that some Americans still adore and support him, including apparently the white supremacists whom he refuses to condemn in no uncertain terms.

What’s with all these continuing rallies? There are no mid-term elections at this time.  If there were, I’m not too sure that very many Republican candidates would want Trump’s support at this time.  The GOP appear to be in disarray following the failure to pass their proposed health care legislation and to end so-called Obamacare.  The White House is in a mess with even the house rats fleeing the premises.  Trump’s staff still spend most of their time trying to clarify what the President’s actual position is on a number of important current issues, not always succeeding to do so.

Instead of parading around the country seeking reaffirmation of his popularity, which is now at an all time low, Trump should spend more time in Washington. He needs to mend fences with Congress, his Cabinet and what’s left of his original staff.  What Americans don’t need are more rallies.  What Americans are looking for is clear and unifying leadership from their president and his administration.  No more off-the-cuff meanderings.  No more divisive speeches full of historical inaccuracies and bombastic statements.  Either be president for all Americans, or resign and let someone else provide the essential leadership needed to tackle the critical issues that America and the world face. Then and only then can one begin to talk about “making America great again”!

Leave a comment »

On Creating Jobs For Disadvantaged Youth, Trump Doesn’t Walk the Talk

The U.S. Federal government has funded a number of worthwhile job creation programs for disadvantaged and unemployed youth. One of these is the Job Corps program which is the nation’s largest residential training and employment program. Job Corps serves about 50,000 young people annually, providing a largely disadvantaged group of 16- to 24-year-olds with training and work experience.  Indeed, it was reported in 2015 that more than 80 percent of Job Corps graduates found a job, went on to college, or entered the military.  71 percent received an industry-recognized credential before graduation.  However, under the Congressional Budget for the Employment and Training Administration, Trump has proposed a 14 percent cut from its $1.7 billion current budget.

Yes, Trump’s recent executive order would redirect over $100 million of federal job training money to pay for the new apprenticeships, supplementing $90 million in funding for the existing program. However, the transfer of funds would be done at the expense of other employment programs like Job Corps and those aimed at seniors and veterans.  As in the case of the Republican health care bill, many of these same individuals would be detrimentally affected by proposed changes to existing programs.  Without such programs as Job Corps, many of these young people would end up in poverty, incarcerated, back on the street and on social assistance.

Trump talks a lot about putting Americans back to work, but budget cuts appear to be telling a different story. As in Canada, American apprenticeship programs are largely controlled by state agencies, unions and educational institutions.  They are fine as far as they go, but most often require certain educational qualifications such as a high school or college diploma.  Most disadvantaged youth have not graduated from high school and would not meet the basic prerequisites.  Some may even have criminal records as juveniles or adolescents. In a country as large and wealthy as the U.S., you’d think that a couple of billion dollars in support of helping disadvantaged youth enter the labour market would be a good thing.  Apparently, the Trump administration doesn’t think so.  So much for walking the talk!

Leave a comment »

Trumps Nominated for ‘Hypocrites’ Of The Year Award

The Oxford English Dictionary defines ‘hypocrisy’ as “the practice of claiming to have higher standards or beliefs than is the case”. A ‘hypocrite’ is a person who indulges in hypocrisy.  Sorry to say, but the Trumps are in line to be named hypocrites of the year.

Donald Trump complains about the millions of cars that Germany sells in the U.S., and has threatened to stop them. Yet over the years he has been an enthusiastic buyer of German luxury cars.  After their Palm Beach wedding in 2005, Donald and Melania reportedly jumped into a Mercedes Maybach limousine.  He reportedly also once bought a limited-edition silver Mercedes SLR McLaren roadster, with a supercharged AMG V8 engine, for the small sum of $465,000. Needless-to-say, Melania had her own Mercedes at the time.

Ivanka Trump’s shoes and other accessories sold as part of her U.S. line are mostly manufactured in China. The Donald J. Trump Collection includes ties, suits, dress shirts, eyeglasses and other accessories. The Washington Post tried last year to ascertain where the products in the Collection were actually manufactured, including those sold on Amazon.com.  Their research showed that the actual country where some products are manufactured is difficult to determine.  However, it was discovered that Trump shirts are made in China, Bangladesh, Honduras and Vietnam and some Trump sport coats are made in India. Trump eyeglasses are made in China.  So much for creating jobs at home.

As President, Trump continues to complain about unfair trading practices by the Chinese, Germans, Canadians, Mexicans and others at the expense of American jobs. Trump criticizes American companies for manufacturing their products overseas.  Meanwhile, Trump trademarks are still being copywrited in various countries overseas, the most recent in China where his company secured 38 new trademarks to develop potential businesses.  This of course has raised serious conflict of interest questions among ethics lawyers.

In more personal terms, Trump recently had an audience with Pope Francis. Talk about hypocrisy.  Here you have a President who wants to ban travel from several predominantly Islamic countries and built a wall between the U.S. and one of the most Catholic countries on the planet, Mexico.  In addition, just think about all those charities that Trump claimed to support, but never did.  Really, Trump is about as religious and charitable as Steve Bannon is a socialist!  The only thing that Trump has in common with the Catholic church is misogyny and wealth.

The list goes on and on, but the evidence speaks for itself. The Trumps have definitely earned consideration for the ‘hypocrites’ award of the year.  Congratulations!!!!

Leave a comment »

Why People Have Become So Reliant On News And Opinion Via Twitter?

Let’s face it, many of the 140-character “tweets” by individuals seem inane. Why would Twitter users want to read short messages about what someone ate for breakfast or lunch?  It’s a reasonable question.  However, people like President Trump seem to understand that social media has become the nervous system of the American news business and political thinking. With one or two tweets, Trump can dominate cable TV, the web, newspapers and talk radio for an entire day.

The attention span of the average American and Canadian is about a few minutes before they need to skip to the next social media excerpt. The need for brief releases proved very successful during Trump’s campaign when he cultivated a Twitter fan base.  His core of supporters continue now  to hang on to his every tweet as if it were gospel.  In turn, the main stream media is forced to pay attention to President Trump’s tweets which have now become part and parcel of our daily news.  However, his continued use of Twitter has proven to be much more than a mere annoyance to Trump’s advisors and staff, since they must regularly respond to each nonsensical tweet by clarifying what the President actually meant to say in the tweets.

Now, we have Twitter co-founder Evan Williams apologizing for the fact that Twitter may have helped Trump become President. You see, Twitter tends to penalize nuance and moderation, while rewarding hot takes and bombast.  Twitter was intended as a research tool to allow individuals, governments and business share information and opinions about products and services through social media.  However, like any new technology, the Internet and Twitter can also be abused by anyone to put out “fake news” or spew hate and falsehoods instantaneously anywhere in the world.

Evan Williams is correct in suggesting that Twitter can create more problems than solutions, but he may be giving social media too much credit. I would suggest that the fact that over fifty percent of Americans and Canadians get their news from social media, their blind acceptance of such news and opinions without further investigation is the real problem.  One 2012 study further revealed that 51 percent of people age 25 to 34 use social networking at the office – more so than any other age group. Doesn’t look good for future generations!

I personally gather my information for my blogs from reputable news sources which are normally peer reviewed for their facts and accuracies. Without journalistic integrity, who is really to blame if individuals simply accept opinions or arguments put forward in tweets and social media as valid and truthful?  Like anything else, it’s buyer beware.  For all you know, one might be providing you with a bill of goods, biased and filled with falsehoods.  I also keep my blogging to four or five short paragraphs in recognition of our brief on-line attention spans.  Given Trump’s limited attention span, Twitter certainly appears to have been made for him.

Leave a comment »

‘Trumpcare’ Danger Is What It Takes Away From Existing Health Insurance

Any politician worth his or her career will tell you that the hardest thing to do in government is to take away what currently exists in law or programs that affect their constituents. Obamacare was often seen as a ‘band-aid’ solution to long-standing problems with health care coverage in the U.S., either private or public. Prior to its introduction at the time, the government estimated that the number of people in the country without health insurance was about 47 million persons.  Furthermore, if the proportions remained constant, it was estimated that there might have been nearly 16 million people with a chronic condition but no insurance to pay for medical care.  Individuals with health preconditions could either not obtain health insurance or could not afford insurance due to much higher premiums.

What the Republicans have to worry about is a real danger to their control of the House and Senate in upcoming elections because of Trumpcare. Based on the current bill, budget analysts estimate 24 million people would lose insurance over a decade, 14 million in the first year. Older Americans would face higher costs. It also gives the states more leeway to reduce coverage under Medicare and Medicaid, as well changing other health care policies. The insurers that will almost certainly feel the strain are those who provide a lot of coverage through Medicaid, which is subsidized. The Democrats have already accused the GOP of favouring the rich over the poor with proposed changes under Trumpcare. One can bet that Democrats will carry this highly emotive issue into the next federal elections. Republicans up for re-election have already faced hostile opposition from affected constituents to the point where some Senators have vowed to write their own bill.

There’s a basic premise in politics that it is always harder for a ruling party to take away provisions or funding that exist under current laws. Given that Obamacare has been around for several years, Americans who have benefited are prepared to fight to maintain their access to health care under the present system. Despite assurances by the GOP and the President, Trumpcare represents a great number of uncertainties. With the health of millions of Americans, both young and old, at stake, these uncertainties represent a real danger to the GOP control of Congress. In dismantling the Affordable Care Act, the stakes are very high, especially if done in a quick and dirty fashion.  No issue has been more contentious in modern times.  If mishandled, this critical issue could eventually lead to the downfall of the GOP, one way or another.

Leave a comment »

President Trump, Cozying Up To ‘Dictators’ Can Be Very Hazardous

In 1938, British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, flew to meet Germany’s Adolf Hitler at his private mountain retreat in Berchtesgaden in an attempt to resolve the Sudetenland crisis in Czechoslovakia. If history has taught us anything, Chamberlain’s appeasement policy made war much more likely because Hitler thought he could get away with anything.  Meetings between legitimate elected leaders and ‘dictators’ are seen as legitimizing ‘dictatorial’ regimes.

Trump’s description of Russia’s Vladimir Putin as a “nice guy” two years after Russia annexed Crimea from the Ukraine baffles one’s mind. The incursion by the Russian military was seen as responsible for the defeat of Ukrainian forces. Many countries, including the U.S. and Canada, implemented economic sanctions against Russia or Russian individuals or companies.  Amnesty International expressed its belief that Russia is fuelling the conflict, noting that there had been an estimated 8000 casualties resulting from the conflict.  The Russian Federation was accused of fuelling the ongoing violence with the presence and continuing influx of foreign fighters and sophisticated weapons and ammunition.  More recently, Putin has aligned himself with Syria’s dictator, Bashar al-Assad, who has used chemical weapons on his own citizens. Maybe, not so much a “nice guy” or one to be admired!

Now one sees President Trump continuing to outreach to rogue leaders, even declaring that he would meet North Korea’s dictator, Kim Jong-un and Philippine president, Rodrigo Duterte. Kim’s grandfather Kim Il-sung established a Stalinist state after the Korean War.  Kim has continued to build a huge military arsenal, including a nuclear potential, while human rights are abused and North Koreans are starving from a lack of food.  Of course, we are familiar with Duterte who is accused of supporting thousands of extrajudicial killings of drug suspects in his country.

Having a face-to-face meeting between two or more businessmen is not the same thing as it is in the world of international diplomacy. You are not only the President of the world’s most powerful nation, but you are also a leader among ‘democratically elected’ national leaders.  You have alliances, both military and political, and their policies and positions must be respected.  The international community looks to you for coherent and strategic leadership, not showmanship.  Simply by meeting with the likes of Assad, Duterte and Kim can look like recognition of and support for their regimes, both internally and externally.  For the most part, this is exactly what they relish and seek out.  Such meetings will achieve very little towards resolving the real issues and dictatorial behaviour.  Only comprehensive and aggressive international actions and their economic and political consequences can help to prevent further abuses in these countries and future threats to global peace.  Indeed, beware of the Chamberlain effect!

Leave a comment »