FROLITICKS

Satirical commentary on Canadian and American current political issues

The “#MeToo” Phenomenon Has Opened the Flood Gates

There is little doubt that claims of sexual harassment in social media have caught the attention of the mainstream media, a number of which are sensational in nature. Now, across the U.S. and Canada, claims of sexual harassment by women and men have been flooding in against politicians, actors, producers, musicians, athletes, trainers, etc., etc. Some claims go back decades, and some are more recent — most frequently involving persons in positions of power. Women in particular have been encouraged by other women and women’s groups to come forward with allegations of past sexual misconduct or assault.  However, in many cases, charges under criminal law have never been laid by the authorities, and often claims were never brought forward by the victims.  Too often, the victims were victimized by the system.  Regularly, it has become a matter of his word against the victim’s word.

Unfortunately, all that one needs to do now is to make accusations via a tweet, e-mail or other social media source. Once out there, such accusations land in the so-called “court of public opinion”.  Moreover, no one has been found guilty in a court of law or accountable by some form of “due process”.  As a result, without further independent investigation, careers can be destroyed and reputations ruined.  Many of the accusations can be found in work-related situations where there may not be any credible, objective and confidential process in place to determine the validity of harassment charges.  Only in recent years have employers been required either by law or through internal policies to institute review processes when harassment claims are made.

However, it appears that both public sector and private sector employers have not been diligent in ensuring that harassment investigation processes are functioning well. Too often, it takes a scandal to become public to bring such inadequacies to the surface.  This situation is no longer acceptable as evidenced by the public’s and shareholders’ outrage.  As well, individuals being openly accused of sexual harassment are being forced to immediately step down from their positions with no access to due process.  As for the alleged victims, one sees increasingly a public “backlash” against some when accusations are simply made through social media without verification as to their validity.  What is now being portrayed as sexual harassment has become so broad that people are beginning to demand greater clarification as to its meaning, and rightly so.

Don’t get me wrong. The fact that the issue of sexual harassment in the workplace has been raised through both social and mainstream media is a good thing.  However, there is obviously a real need for employers to quickly react in positive ways so as to prevent future claims of harassment and to protect employees in their workplaces.  Independent, confidential and just processes must be in place to ensure fairness for both the accuser and the accused.  We’ve seen what happens when unsubstantiated accusations become public.  Indeed, we live in very thorny times.

Leave a comment »

Sexual Harassment Is Alive But Not So Well In The Corridors of Power

Not since the dismissal in the fall of 2014 of CBC Radio star Jian Ghomeshi for the sexual harassment of several employees has the issue become as explosive as it has in recent weeks. Of course, it all started with allegations of sexual harassment and assault by numerous women against Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein. Now stories by women and men of sexual harassment are coming out the woodwork involving high profiled men in the political, business and entertainment arena.  The notable use of social media has opened up the flood gates.  Countless women and men have rallied around the Twitter hashtag #metoo to reveal their own experiences with sex abuse, including in the workplace, diminishing the associated stigma.

In Canada, the Ghomeshi scandal helped to spur greater provincial protections that are now in effect through several new laws and policies. The changes beefed up provisions against sex harassment and bullying and gave governments the power to order an employer to conduct an impartial investigation when a complaint is made. Companies have also been forced to review and revamp their own policies to comply and are more aggressive in rooting out the problem of sexual harassment in their workplaces.

To date, the same cannot be said for in the U.S., although the federal and state governments will most likely have to deal with the matter in a more transparent and direct manner. After all, according to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, up to 85 percent of American women say that they have been sexually harassed at work. However, only a fraction of those cases are reported, partially due to the professional and legal risks for women who come forward. Nevertheless, women’s advocates are now noting that there appears to be a major ‘cultural and societal shift’ in the works.

In Canada, a 2014 survey by the Angus Reid Institute found that 43 percent of Canadian women had been sexually harassed at work. Unfortunately, the same survey found that men were more likely than women to agree that potentially problematic workplace behaviours were acceptable. In addition, a third of men (34 per cent) believed that sexual harassment in the workplace is “overblown” and receives more attention than it should.  It would appear that a real change in our attitudes about harassment still has a ways to go.  Maybe, just maybe, the recent high profile revelations of sexual misconduct in the U.S. may be enough to potentially lead to some real attitudinal changes. The fact is that everyone is responsible here and must work to stop such an obvious abuse of power.  It’s about time!

Leave a comment »

What Is It With CBC Radio and the Case of Jian Ghomeshi’s Firing?

If you haven’t heard by now, the CBC Radio, part of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), just fired Jian Ghomeshi the popular host of the national radio show “Q”. The reason apparently has to do with recent public disclosures by several women about sexual harassment, including accounts of his hitting and choking dates during sex without their consent. Mr. Ghomeshi has admitted publicly to liking “kinky” or “rough” sex. None of the women, claiming to have been victims, had pressed charges against Mr. Ghomeshi for sexual assault. Therefore, none of the allegations against Mr. Ghomeshi have been proven in court and he has not been charged as yet with any crime. The CBC publicly stated only that it had received information that made it impossible to continue employing him. In response to his firing (somewhere in his contract there must be some sort of “morality clause”), Mr. Ghomeshi launched a $55 Million lawsuit against the Corporation.

All of this is very disturbing of course. However, what is even more disturbing is a newly disclosed revelation by a female employee of CBC Radio. As a young producer of the “Q” show, she claims that she was sexually harassed by Mr. Ghomeshi. In 2010 she revealed to the show’s Executive Producer that she had been harassed by the show’s host. She was allegedly told by the Executive Producer that Mr. Ghomeshi was too big a celebrity, and she might as well adapt to the situation and not complain. Like many of the women who have come out with allegations of sexual misconduct by Mr. Ghomeshi, the now ex-CBC employee said she was not willing to have her name published for fear of retribution.

What bothers me about this scenario is that there are labour standards laws on the books dealing with workplace sexual harassment and the responsibilities of employers. The CBC is regulated under Canada’s federal legislation. Part III of the Canada Labour Code (Code) has specific provisions dealing with sexual harassment (see Section 247.1 of Division XV.1). Under these provisions, the CBC as the employer is obligated to have in place a policy dealing with sexual harassment and is responsible to make all employees aware of the policy. Under the Code, every employee is entitled to employment free of sexual harassment. In addition, the policy must state that the employer will take such disciplinary measures as the employer deems appropriate against persons under the employer’s direction who subject employees to sexual harassment. Since this was not done earlier in the above case, the CBC would have been found to have violated this particular labour law.

Unfortunately, as is the case in numerous such work situations, employees are very often not aware that they can bring a complaint against their employer to the responsible authorities for such violations. Too often, employees are reluctant to stir up any publicity for fear of some sort of retribution or potential damaging impacts on their future career. The reason that we have such laws is to help prevent such cases now and in the future. However, it is important that employees understand their legal rights and the responsibilities and policies of their employers. Hopefully, harassed employees would then be more aware of the various avenues available for resolving their situations without retribution. In turn, government authorities should do a better job of ensuring that employers are clearly aware of their legal responsibilities to tackle workplace “sexual harassment” issues. It goes without saying: “Contrary to its own policies, shame on the CBC for having waited so long to act!”

Leave a comment »