Politics is defined in the Oxford English Dictionary as “the activities associated with the governance of a country or area.” In the 1800s, Otto von Bismarck, a German leader, was quoted as saying that: “Politics is the art of the possible.” Other notables have commented on the art of politics, including the Chinese leader Moa Zedong who stipulated that “Politics is war without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed.” Abraham Lincoln suggested that “The ballot is stronger than the bullet.” Emma Goldman, a Russian anarchist in the early 1900s, was quoted as sarcastically saying that if politics could change anything, they would make it illegal. For those who are new to the so-called discipline of political science, there are plenty of reference materials dealing with the question of politics. For the grand total of $13.95 on Amazon, one can get a paperback entitled The Art of the Possible: An Everyday Guide to Politics by Edward Keenan and illustrated by Julie McLaughlin, that even 10 to 14 year olds can read and hopefully understand. For aspiring politicians, there are most likely various versions of “politics for dummies.”
At various times in American and Canadian history, there have been periods where people questioned our system of governance. Life may have been somewhat simpler when we had theocracies, trusting in the guidance of a higher power, as interpreted by the clergy. However, with the separation of church and state, one now has to rely almost entirely on the collective wisdom of politicians and their political platforms. The problem emerges when the people begin to loose faith in the political system and the trust in government is on the decline. One can safely say that we are now in one such period. We have to ask ourselves what brings us together and what divides us? I would have thought that the pandemic would have brought us together in collectively battling this global disease. Instead, especially in the U.S., the measures brought about by governments to minimize the associated deaths and illnesses, including vaccine mandates, appear to have polarized the population even more. We remain seriously divided on several of the other major current issues, including climate change, abortion, gun control, capital punishment, to name but a few.
As a democracy, debate is essential to develop policies in order to effectively and efficiently tackle the issues of the day, often seeking middle ground on those issues. However, for some reason, politics today has become so polarized as to hinder the normal and reasoned discussions that should take place. Instead, there appears to be a growing wave of anger and dissatisfaction among a segment of the populace, leading to what has become known as “populism” in both the U.S. and Canada. Donald Trump took advantage of this apparent rage and its accompanying attraction to extremism and reducing the role of government.
In politics, reasonable debate has to be encouraged. By reasonable, I mean that opposite sides have to introduce indisputable facts, with clear rationale and no dogma attached. This continues to be difficult in an era when “expertise” and “science” is increasingly under attack, as clearly shown during the pandemic. In addition, arguments simply based on religious beliefs should not be used as the sole basis for a position, unless one believes we are living in a theocracy.
Yes, politics can be the art of the possible when all parties work together in collaboration and with common goals to tackle some of the most important questions of our time. Simply adhering to one’s party lines is not going to get us anywhere fast. Simply relying on past political beliefs and jurisprudence is not going to help us achieve what we need to achieve in the Twenty-First Century. Significant change is needed, but difficult to reach if one continues to arrive at political stalemates. Yes, I believe that all voices have to be heard as part of any democratic society. Our rights only extend to that place where they don’t infringe on the rights of others. This is why we have statutory protections and the rule of law. The fundamental principles of our political system rely on the people continuously defending our democracies to the fullest extent, not by violence but by the ballot.
FROLITICKS 