FROLITICKS

Satirical commentary on Canadian and American current political issues

What Millennials And Generation Z Have In Common

Over the last decade, a lot has been written about today’s younger generation, most notably the so-called millennials and Gen Zers.  As you are aware, millennials are between 28 and 43, and Gen Z generally refers to those ages 12 to 27.  Some observers believe that millennials had it bad financially, but Gen Z may have it even worse.  Millennials did go through two recessions, including the Great Recession of 2008.  Many struggled to get jobs, particularly following the Great Recession, when the nation’s unemployment rate hovered around 10 percent for over a year. Their wages took a massive hit, too.  On average, millennials lost about 13 percent of their earnings between 2007 and 2017.  Gen Z has gone through the recent pandemic, and came out seeing a totally different labour market, especially for recent college graduates.  Both the millennials and Gen Zers have faced tough labour market conditions, making it harder to get good paying jobs, especially among blue-collar workers.  Now, they are facing ever increasing debt loads and tough housing costs, making it difficult to purchase that important first home.  Indeed, Gen Z is the first generation where recent college grads are more likely to be unemployed than the general population.  In addition, both groups left college with significant student loan debts.

Why is this scenario important?   First of all, millennials were the largest generation group in the U.S.
in 2023, with an estimated population of 72.7 million.  Millennials recently surpassed Baby Boomers as the biggest group, and they will continue to be a major part of the population for many years.  Add in Gen Zers, who made up 61.3 million of the American population, these two groups now represent a major, if not the biggest voting block in the U.S. They will play a key role in the upcoming American elections next November, something both the Democrats and Republicans are well aware of.

Can President Biden appeal to the youth vote?  Biden and the Democrats have relied heavily on their vote in the past.  However, with the current inflationary economy and difficult employment situation, I wouldn’t count on it.  Since they may not necessarily favour former President Trump, they may instead simply decide not to vote.  Such an outcome would have a major impact on both political parties.  Among women in both groups, there may be more hope for the Democrats in light of the Republican stance on abortion, particularly in Republican led states.  This has yet to be seen.

Although Trump’s popularity among young adults, aged 18 to 34, plummeted as he tried to overturn the 2020 election, Gallup’s 2023 surveys of U.S. adults indicated that his popularity has rebounded since.  Forty-two percent of young adults saw him favourably in October 2020, but that dropped to 28 percent in January 2021.  His favorability bounced back to 42 percent by December 2023, especially among young Hispanics and Blacks.  Younger voters, under the age of 30, feel worse about the economy than older cohorts.  Not surprisingly, in the latest New York Times/Sienna poll, for example, Black voters feel as bad about the economy as their white counterparts and Latino voters feel even worse.  Will his recent conviction have an impact?

What is also interesting is the fact that following the January 6, 2021 assault on the Hill, Trump’s popularity took a significant dip among younger voters.  However, the improvement in Trump’s favorability now can be partly attributed to the fading memories of January 6 and the tumultuous year that was 2020.  As in the case of the last election, social media will once again play a significant role in influencing the views of younger voters more than any other age group.  The question becomes whether younger voters will believe everything posted on social media or will also look to main stream media sources for their information?

There is little doubt that bread and butter issues will dominate the electoral scene this year more than any other issue.  How millennials and Gen Zers view the economic platforms of both political parties will more than likely determine the final outcome of the election.  With so much in common, both parties will have to take major steps to win over their votes.

Leave a comment »

Future of Child Care Up in the Air in Both the U.S. and Canada

Providing adequate child care has been a major issue in both countries.  From an economic point of view and in terms of economic growth, the continued participation of women in the labour market is recognized as being extremely important.  A 2019 Washington Post article reported that in 1990, 74 percent of American women between the ages of 25 and 54 either had a job or were looking for one, the sixth-highest rate among 22 rich countries.  By 2017, though, that number had risen to 75 percent, by then the fourth-lowest share among the same group of wealthy nations.  In Canada, statistics have shown that the participation of women in the labour force has consistantly been well above 60 percent in recent decades.  There are more working couples than ever, especially now that more women have chosen professional careers and many are needed in numerous labour-intensive sectors such as in health care, education, retail and the services.  Interestingly, a Statistics Canada study in 2019, noted that approximately 60 percent of children aged 0 to 5 years were participating in a formal or informal type of child care arrangement.

In order to support women’s participation, numerous jurisdictions have taken measures to reduce the costs of child care.  In both countries, child care is a direct responsibility of the states and provinces, with support funding often provided by the federal governments.  In 2003, the Canadian federal government announced a $1-billion, multiyear investment proposal in child care, requiring negotiations with the provinces to eventually establish a national child care program.  Consequently, Canada recently introduced a program to subsidize universal child care, in due course providing an average fee of 10 dollar-a-day child care by 2025-26 to all Canadian families.  During the pandemic in the U.S., there was temporary relief to keep the industry afloat.  The federal government made $24 billion available to the states.  Many providers were given thousands of dollars a month, depending on their size, which they used to pay for expenses, the biggest of which was wages.

Running a child care business has long been a very challenging math problem.  Many providers can barely afford to operate, yet many parents cannot afford to pay more.  It has also become harder to recruit child-care workers, one of the lowest-paying jobs in both countries.  With the termination of pandemic federal funding, some states, including a few led by Republicans, have invested state funds to make up for the pursuant loss of federal funds.  For example, this year Vermont will start to spend $125 million a year for large expansions in eligibility for subsidies for low-income families, and Kentucky spent $50 million on grants after federal funds expired.  Reportedly, the Biden administration has asked Congress for $16 billion for one year of additional funding for child care.  Apparently, a group of Democratic senators support it.  However, it is unlikely that it would get the Republican approval needed to pass.

There are additional considerations that have a direct impact on the current use of child care.  During the pandemic, many women began working from home.  Known as remote work, this has permitted some parents to increasingly provide home-based child care, further reducing their family costs and reliance on outside services.  In addition, the current high inflation has had a direct impact on the costs of running a child care operation, hitting the bottom line of many businesses.  Expenses include payroll, utilities, mortgage payments, food and supplies.  Like everyone, low-paid child-care workers have been affected by high inflation, and the result is a greater turnover rate among such workers.

While there are always debates over whether home care or external child care are more effective regarding a child’s early development, the fact is that the provision of quality child care is considered an essential element of a modern economy and its growth.  Those providing child care services are facing very difficult circumstances, everything from increasing costs to a shortage of qualified child-care workers.  In particular, the pay and working conditions for such workers, many qualified in early learning, has to be improved.  It is inexcusable that a society doesn’t adequately support those responsible for caring for our children, be they parents or child-care workers.  This is certainly one of the most crucial issues of our decade.

Leave a comment »

Work-Life Balance and Shift to More Stay-at-Home Fathers

One thing that the pandemic has done is to give more fathers, notably those working remotely, a chance to spend more time with their family members, especially their children.  A study by Statistics Canada in 2010 indicated that about 12 percent of stay-at-home parents were the fathers, triple the number recorded in 1986.  I would expect that many of us probably know at least one or more parenting couples where the man has stayed at home for a number of valid and rational reasons.  Often, it is the fact that the woman is in a better paying job with good health and dental benefits, as well as opportunities for advancement.  Due to changes in the labour market, data has shown that women increasingly have become the top earner in the family.  In many cases, there are considerations over the high cost of childcare, particularly where it is not subsidized by the state and where affordable and licensed childcare is lacking.  From a monetary point of view, it just doesn’t make any financial sense for both parents to work.

A survey by Harvard’s Making Caring Common project in June 2020 found that more than two-thirds of fathers said they felt closer to their children since the pandemic started.  As well, according to a Morning Consult survey for The New York Times in 2022, 47 percent of employed fathers said flexibility and control over their hours was a top priority.  This is 10 percentage points more than those who said they felt that way before the pandemic.  Recruiters are also now seeing more and more men with families who are asking about the company’s position on flexible hours and parental leave provisions.

Surprisingly, many employers still require long, inflexible hours and penalize workers for prioritizing family life.  However, what the pandemic and its impact on working conditions did is to expedite what was already a known trend in the labour market.  Working remotely has given more fathers the opportunity to share greater responsibility in household duties and childcare.  Where both parents worked, working women in the past had to do most of the household work. Now, all that has changed with the advent of new technologies and working conditions.  In many occupations in certain industries, telework and hybrid work have increasingly become the norm. 

There is little doubt that efforts to reduce the costs of childcare and ensure the quality of public and private childcare providers will result in influencing the current trends, particularly in Canada.  Recently, provincial governments signed on to a major federal initiative to increase the amount of affordable childcare spaces across the country over the next five to ten years.

Regardless, more and more fathers will be looking to their employers to accommodate having more time to spend with their families.  The issue of work-life balance is at the top of their agenda, forcing employers to adjust accordingly if they wish to retain experienced and motivated employees, both men and women.

Leave a comment »

Women Still Cannot Break Corporate Glass Ceilings

Yes it takes time for more women to reach leadership positions in companies, even though more and more qualified women are entering business management fields.  One human resource expert in 2011 referred to the so-called infamous glass ceiling as being more of a brick ceiling.  Yes, there are more women in senior management than ever before.  However, proportionately, they still are under-represented as to their numbers in businesses in general.  Back in 2020, Bloomberg News reported that women held more than a quarter of the board seats at S&P 500 companies for the first time, a significant gain.  It was also reported at the time that, according to Catalyst which follows labour market trends, there now were 32 women leading S&P 500 companies.  Increasingly although at a snail’s pace, more women are now holding the top finance jobs (e.g. Chief Financial Officers) at large U.S. companies, despite the fact that companies continue to have fewer women in operational roles.

What is disheartening in 2022, Bloomberg News reports that women are leaving the top ranks of companies at higher rates than ever before — as female employees remain less likely to get promoted into leadership roles in the first place.  According to a new McKinsey & Co. and LeanIn.org report, for every woman at the director level who gets promoted, two female directors are choosing to leave their company.  Bloomberg notes that while women have long been at a disadvantage in the workplace, many of problems have been further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.  For example, a lack of affordable childcare has contributed to more women leaving the workforce than men in recent years.  A gender pay gap, which had been narrowing, also stalled during the pandemic.  Furthermore, those in the highest ranks of their organizations are re-evaluating — because of a lack of advancement opportunities, flexibility or unequal treatment or a combination of these and other factors.  Many of the factors were once again particularly true for women representing visible minority groups, such as women of colour.  Women of colour continue to represent far fewer women promoted to a manager role from entry-level when compared to women in general.  This is further complicated by the fact that there are still simply fewer women in upper management at most companies to be promoted.

McKinsey and LeanIn reported also that the pandemic affected women in other ways, in particular those related to remote work and work-life balance, especially where children are involved.  They found that only one in ten female employees want to work from the office most of the time.  The summary of their report said “many” women call hybrid work schedules a key reason for joining or sticking with an employer.  LeanIn CEO Rachel Thomas points out that: “Women are not breaking up with work, they are breaking up with companies who are not delivering the work culture and the opportunity and the flexibility that’s so critically important to them”.

Women have made some strides to break the glass ceiling in recent years.  According to a 2014 report by Reuters, for the first time more than half of 4,000 corporations worldwide reported boards with 10 percent or more female members.  However, it is noted that for all the progress that’s been made, male CEOs and board members still vastly outnumber women. 

All in all, it appears that the pandemic has stalled the steady progression which promoted more and more qualified women to senior management and corporate board positions.  Most governments in the U.S. and Canada have made it clear that the current situation is still unacceptable.  At all levels of government, most have promoted women to leadership and judicial positions, cabinet portfolios, and have attempted to encourage more women to run for political office.  On the other hand, as one author noted, the inability to recruit and retain women in the corporate arena could be disastrous for businesses.  This is not hyperbole, especially when women now make up the majority of university grads and most plan to enter the labour force upon graduation.  Yes, frustration has set in and rightly so.  Paying lip service and tokenism are no longer an option!  At this time, what one has is only a crack in the glass ceiling!

Leave a comment »

Far More Political And Societal Division Among Americans Than Among Canadians

In July in both the U.S. and Canada, people will be respectively celebrating the birth of their countries.  However, these past few years have demonstrated a concerning growth in divisive politics, much more so in the U.S. than in Canada.  Most recently, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade allowing states to ban abortion.  This is despite the fact that polls have shown that only one in ten Americans want an absolute ban on abortion.  In Canada, the right to abortion is supported by all major political parties and the vast majority of Canadians.  When it comes to restrictions on accessibility to guns, the majority of Americans support increasing restrictions to gun ownership, while the gun lobby holds sway in Congress and many states.  Supported by the majority in Canada, there are restrictions on guns, especially handguns and military-style weapons — a number of the latter are outright banned.  Although numerous American organizations and groups have lobbied to eliminate the death penalty in half of the states where it exists, Canada did away with the death penalty decades ago.  It is now believed that the recent Supreme Court’s decision could also lead to a reconsideration of Americans’ right to same sex marriage, something which has been legalized in Canada for sometime now.

A new poll of Canadians by the U.K.’s well known pollster Lord Michael Ashcroft showed that Canada, rather than the polarized society on display in America, is described as a nation that is proud and hopeful.  He concluded that most Canadians are a lot more confident, empathetic, proud and trusting of their own democracy and national identity, frequently seeking a middle ground on controversial issues.  Fully seven in ten Canadians think Canada is one of the best places to live and multiculturalism is a healthy and important element of Canadian society and thus encourages immigration to the country.  Yes, there are some small vocal dissident groups who surface from time to time in Canada, but nowhere near the numbers of American right-wing and social conservative groups who even emerged to contest the results of the 2020 U.S. presidential election.  Thankfully, there is no equivalent to Donald Trump in Canada.

The current infringement on the rights of American women with the overturning of Roe vs. Wade will further increase the division among Americans across the country.  This will become a highly contentious issue in the upcoming November elections, with pro-life and pro-choice candidates slugging it out on the hastings.  When a draft copy of the decision was leaked in May, even Donald Trump began telling friends and advisers that it would anger suburban women, a group who helped tilt the 2020 race to President Joe Biden.  He felt that would lead to a backlash against Republicans in the November midterm elections.  However, as per the New York Times, with the decision Trump put out a statement taking a victory lap, including applauding himself for sticking by his choice of nominees.  On top of which, the court’s decision is unfortunately expected to disproportionately affect minority women who already face limited access to health care.  In addition, for those women who can afford to come to Canada, Canadian abortion services are currently examining the potential impact in welcoming these Americans.

With respect to another grouping, our indigenous people of North America, both the U.S. and Canada in the past had used residential schools in an attempt to assimilate indigenous populations by eliminating their culture and languages.  However, unlike in the U.S., Canadians began a national reconciliation process reflecting honestly on the darkest parts of history and attempting to move forward to correct past abuses.  Canadians of all backgrounds have come forward to fully support the truth and reconciliation initiatives at all levels of society.  The same issue has barely been recognized in the States.

All in all, one cannot but conclude that there is far more political and societal division among Americans than among Canadians.  The next decade could prove to be one of the most explosive in American history, with the current polarization of American society almost as great as that preceding the American Civil War between the North and South over the abolition of slavery.  Only time will tell.  Not a great time to be living in the States!

Leave a comment »

How Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s Actions Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Facing the scandalous report alleging that he displayed inappropriate behaviour, often sexual in nature, toward several women while in office, New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo has now resigned.  Here one has a governor who claimed to champion women’s rights, but one who also had an office was considered “toxic” by the affected women.  While it appeared that Cuomo advanced a feminist agenda, there are those that now argue that it was just smoke and mirror politics.  Once again, it takes a high profile case to demonstrate that sexual harassment in the workplace continues to be an issue of major concern to both employers and employees.

Interestingly enough, Statistics Canada just released a report that concluded that one in four women and one in six men reported having experienced inappropriate sexualized behaviours at work in 2020.  Inappropriate sexualized behaviours are defined to include inappropriate verbal or non-verbal communication, sexually explicit materials, and unwanted physical contact or suggested sexual relations.  The survey also found that people with formal authority in the workplace ― such as supervisors and bosses ― were often the perpetrators of inappropriate sexualized behaviours.  Women most often identified a man as the perpetrator of all three types of the above defined inappropriate sexualized behaviour.  In addition, because the harassment that they experience at work is most often by a superior, people are reluctant to come forward fearing negative consequences for their careers if they did so.

Today, many jurisdictions require that employers have some form of written harassment policy in place and that it is clearly communicated to all employees, including management.  As well, most businesses must have an independent harassment complaint process in place to allow employees to come forward in a confidential and timely manner.  However, as the Statistics Canada survey indicated, approximately one-third of women and one-quarter of men surveyed said that they had not received any information from their employer on how to report sexual harassment and sexual assault.  Furthermore, such impartial complaint mechanisms should also deal with matters regarding discrimination on the basis of actual or perceived gender, gender identity or sexual orientation.

What is truly sad about the Cuomo case is the fact that it took so long to finally surface.  It took no fewer than five district attorneys who made preliminary inquiries into Cuomo’s alleged sexual harassment, now detailed in the scathing 165-page report released last week.  The report from state Attorney General Letitia James’ office found Cuomo sexually harassed at least 11 women — including nine current or former state employees — in violation of state and federal law.  Apparently, his resignation won’t end a bevy of pending investigations into him and his administration.  According to those in the know, the investigations and litigation could enmesh Cuomo for months or years after his scheduled departure from public office in two weeks.

What is interesting is that Cuomo was in his third term as governor, having been first elected in 2010.  One has to ask in this “#me too” movement era, why it took so long — some ten years — for these alleged complaints to come forward, and why it took an investigation by the Attorney General’s office to finally reveal the harassment complaints?  I would hope that there will be some form of formal inquiry into the whole process itself, examining why these women had to allegedly and silently endure what they endured over those years under question.  Moreover, as the above noted survey illustrates, the issue of harassment in the workplace is much broader than we think.  This is despite all the legal protections against such harassment for both men and women that now exist in most jurisdictions.  Hopefully, the Cuomo case will encourage governments, organizations and businesses to once again examine their harassment policies and complaint processes.

Leave a comment »

What’s Sad — It’s Still An Old Boys’ Club In The U.S. Congress!

Watching Christine Blasey Ford and Brett Kavanaugh testifying on September 27th before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee really brought home the image of the Senate as still being an old boys’ club.  There you had a cast of old Republican senators sitting in judgement of Dr. Ford, preferring to have hired an Arizona prosecutor Rachel Mitchell to ask questions on their behalf. This was of course a political stunt to avoid giving the impression of a bunch of old guys ganging up on a woman.  What’s worse, the whole circus was conducted as if it were a criminal trial instead of a Supreme Court confirmation hearing.

This event brings me back to a recent study by the Pew Research Center in the U.S. which looked at the proportion of women to men in senior positions in governors’ seats, state legislatures, Congress, businesses and education institutions. What the study found is that only 20 percent of Congress is women, although women make up over half of the American population.  Women represent about 22 percent of senators.  The density of women in the House of Representatives is just below 1 in 5.  In both cases, most women are Democrats.  Hopefully, there could be more than 60 women who assume new seats in Congress after this November midterms — most of those women being Democrats. In addition, the Center found that Democratic presidents have had more heavily female Cabinets than Republican administrations.  There are far fewer women in Trump’s Cabinet than there were in Obama’s.

Other Western countries have achieved much more equality of government representation than the U.S., and even Canada. Moreover, Judge Kavanaugh comes from a primarily white male environment, attending the right prep schools and having the accepted middle-class conservative pedigree.  What’s there not to like, especially within the old boys’ club in Washington.  There are currently only three female associate judges on the nine member Supreme Court, with the one existing vacancy.  Just for once, maybe the President could have considered nominating another respected female jurist to the Supreme Court, conservative or otherwise.  However, unfortunately we know what Donald Trump thinks about women!

Leave a comment »

The “#MeToo” Phenomenon Has Opened the Flood Gates

There is little doubt that claims of sexual harassment in social media have caught the attention of the mainstream media, a number of which are sensational in nature. Now, across the U.S. and Canada, claims of sexual harassment by women and men have been flooding in against politicians, actors, producers, musicians, athletes, trainers, etc., etc. Some claims go back decades, and some are more recent — most frequently involving persons in positions of power. Women in particular have been encouraged by other women and women’s groups to come forward with allegations of past sexual misconduct or assault.  However, in many cases, charges under criminal law have never been laid by the authorities, and often claims were never brought forward by the victims.  Too often, the victims were victimized by the system.  Regularly, it has become a matter of his word against the victim’s word.

Unfortunately, all that one needs to do now is to make accusations via a tweet, e-mail or other social media source. Once out there, such accusations land in the so-called “court of public opinion”.  Moreover, no one has been found guilty in a court of law or accountable by some form of “due process”.  As a result, without further independent investigation, careers can be destroyed and reputations ruined.  Many of the accusations can be found in work-related situations where there may not be any credible, objective and confidential process in place to determine the validity of harassment charges.  Only in recent years have employers been required either by law or through internal policies to institute review processes when harassment claims are made.

However, it appears that both public sector and private sector employers have not been diligent in ensuring that harassment investigation processes are functioning well. Too often, it takes a scandal to become public to bring such inadequacies to the surface.  This situation is no longer acceptable as evidenced by the public’s and shareholders’ outrage.  As well, individuals being openly accused of sexual harassment are being forced to immediately step down from their positions with no access to due process.  As for the alleged victims, one sees increasingly a public “backlash” against some when accusations are simply made through social media without verification as to their validity.  What is now being portrayed as sexual harassment has become so broad that people are beginning to demand greater clarification as to its meaning, and rightly so.

Don’t get me wrong. The fact that the issue of sexual harassment in the workplace has been raised through both social and mainstream media is a good thing.  However, there is obviously a real need for employers to quickly react in positive ways so as to prevent future claims of harassment and to protect employees in their workplaces.  Independent, confidential and just processes must be in place to ensure fairness for both the accuser and the accused.  We’ve seen what happens when unsubstantiated accusations become public.  Indeed, we live in very thorny times.

Leave a comment »

Sexual Harassment Is Alive But Not So Well In The Corridors of Power

Not since the dismissal in the fall of 2014 of CBC Radio star Jian Ghomeshi for the sexual harassment of several employees has the issue become as explosive as it has in recent weeks. Of course, it all started with allegations of sexual harassment and assault by numerous women against Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein. Now stories by women and men of sexual harassment are coming out the woodwork involving high profiled men in the political, business and entertainment arena.  The notable use of social media has opened up the flood gates.  Countless women and men have rallied around the Twitter hashtag #metoo to reveal their own experiences with sex abuse, including in the workplace, diminishing the associated stigma.

In Canada, the Ghomeshi scandal helped to spur greater provincial protections that are now in effect through several new laws and policies. The changes beefed up provisions against sex harassment and bullying and gave governments the power to order an employer to conduct an impartial investigation when a complaint is made. Companies have also been forced to review and revamp their own policies to comply and are more aggressive in rooting out the problem of sexual harassment in their workplaces.

To date, the same cannot be said for in the U.S., although the federal and state governments will most likely have to deal with the matter in a more transparent and direct manner. After all, according to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, up to 85 percent of American women say that they have been sexually harassed at work. However, only a fraction of those cases are reported, partially due to the professional and legal risks for women who come forward. Nevertheless, women’s advocates are now noting that there appears to be a major ‘cultural and societal shift’ in the works.

In Canada, a 2014 survey by the Angus Reid Institute found that 43 percent of Canadian women had been sexually harassed at work. Unfortunately, the same survey found that men were more likely than women to agree that potentially problematic workplace behaviours were acceptable. In addition, a third of men (34 per cent) believed that sexual harassment in the workplace is “overblown” and receives more attention than it should.  It would appear that a real change in our attitudes about harassment still has a ways to go.  Maybe, just maybe, the recent high profile revelations of sexual misconduct in the U.S. may be enough to potentially lead to some real attitudinal changes. The fact is that everyone is responsible here and must work to stop such an obvious abuse of power.  It’s about time!

Leave a comment »

Men Need To Step Up To Prevent Verbal and Physical Abuse Against Women

Donald Trump’s recorded verbal abuse against women is just the most recent example of misogynistic and uncalled for attacks on women. The truth is that the twenty-first century has started off just as badly as the twentieth century ended when it comes to abuses against women.  Women continue to be the victims of domestic violence far more then men.  Just as bad, women continue to be sexually objectified by the porn industry and increasingly through the Internet and social media.  Women are degraded by men for not meeting certain physical standards created by the male-dominated bastion of commerce.  A ‘rape culture’ exists on many of North America’s college campuses, with victims still finding it all too difficult to come forward.

Today, there are laws and institutions aimed at ensuring that workers are free from sexual and other forms of harassment in the workplace. There are more employers who provide for employment equity and who promote equal pay for work of equal value, particularly when it comes to female employees.  However, in some professions women still face employer bias and the ‘glass ceiling’, and sexism is “alive and well in the workplace”. It is a fact that female executives who take time off to have children and become mothers are often discriminated against when they return to work, particularly in terms of promotion.  A recent study of the top 1,000 U.S. companies found that the Chief Executive Officer position was held by only 5 percent of women, even though women now make up half of our labour force.

Society is doing a better job in dealing seriously with domestic violence and date rape, the vast majority of victims who are women. Nevertheless, authorities and institutions have to improve at dealing with attacks against women and in educating men as to their responsibilities towards the treatment of women.  Attitudes and behaviours are derived by the values instilled in our children from a very young age onwards.  Parents, schools, communities and societal institutions have to ensure that these are the appropriate values when it comes to the treatment of women.

I have a young granddaughter who is as smart as a whip and can hold her own with her older brothers. I refuse to believe that she doesn’t deserve every opportunity to grow up in a society respectful of women’s rights.  As a man, a father, a grandfather, I will do everything possible to ensure that my granddaughter will have a life free from verbal and physical abuse.  All that I ask is that other men step up to do the same for all women.  After all, we are about to have the first female President of the United States of America. It’s about time!

Leave a comment »