Back in March of this year, the Biden administration ordered changes to a range of federal surveys to gather more detailed information about the nation’s ethnic and racial makeup. Why is this important? For example, most people of Middle Eastern and North African descent reportedly are currently classified as “white” in U.S. census data. According to the Census Bureau estimates, this represented about 3.5 million people falling into that category. They represent for example people whose descent is Lebanese, Egyptian, Iranian, Syrian, Iraqi, and Israeli. Under the new format, people of Middle Eastern and North African descent will have their own category. Officials of the Office of Management and Budget, which oversaw the review of the current survey questions, said the changes were needed in part to make surveys more accurate.
The reason more accurate surveys are increasingly important is that America is increasing becoming more diverse. The non-white population has nearly doubled since 1990 to over 40% in 2023, as the proportion of non-Hispanic whites decreased from 75% to 58%. According to the USAFacts Team, the nation’s non-white population has almost doubled over the past four decades, growing from about 24% of the population in 1990 to over 40% in 2023. Furthermore, according to the US Census Bureau, the multiracial population is projected to be the fastest-growing racial or ethnic group over the next four decades, followed by the Asian or Pacific Islander and Hispanic populations. The non-Hispanic white population is expected to continue shrinking.
The above announced changes most likely have the potential to rankle conservatives who believe that the nation’s focus on diversity has already gone too far. Interestingly, both the Republicans and Democrats during the recent election attempted vigorously to cater to Blacks, Latinos and Hispanics to have their votes which were deemed critical in several states. This time around, the Trump campaign notably targeted those communities with diverse populations. In many cases, the non-White populace was just as concerned about the economy and immigration as many of his White supporters. Something that the Democratic Party failed to fully realize during its campaign — a startling factor given Pamela Harris being a Black candidate.
Now one has to ask is whether Donald Trump will allocate more positions in his cabinet to better reflect the nation’s diversity? So far, the answer appears to be a resounding “no”. Specifically selecting people from such bodies as Fox News certainly doesn’t help. He may have to go outside his comfort zone! In addition, federal policies will have to better reflect the importance of diverse populations. Those who broadly support the new survey questions — academics, civil liberties advocates and racial and ethnic interest groups among them — say they would help promote greater fairness in schools, housing, hiring and other aspects of society where census data is used. I’m not so sure that Trump’s immediate advisory body, made up mainly of rich White men, is going to facilitate appropriately dealing with such issues.
Favouring one group over another will lead to even more division within the country. Hopefully, the Republicans in Congress will appreciate this matter in their deliberations. Many marginalized groups are made up of persons from diverse communities, and are affected particularly hard by any reduction in socio-economic benefit programs. Such policies would no doubt lead to increased hardships for these people. Cutting such programs in the name of “efficiency” should not be an option in these dire times, accentuated by growing poverty, homelessness and inadequate medical care. One has to question what Trump means when he proposes to make America great again? Just who will actually benefit?