Let’s first start with a new study out of Columbia University and recently published in Journal of Forensic Sciences which concludes that mental illness is not the cause of the vast majority of mass shootings. When a domestic terrorist incident occurs involving a mass shooting or an attack on a high-profile person, the first reflective reaction is not to want to completely dismiss mental illness, like psychosis, as the primary cause. The authors note that this immediate reflex assumption exacerbates “the already widespread stigma surrounding severe mental illness”. The extensive study concluded that for perpetrators who used firearms, just over 80 percent did not have a mental illness. Sixty-eight percent of those who used other means for murder, like stabbing, did not have a mental illness, either. One of the study’s authors, Dr. Ragy R. Girgis, who is the director at the Center of Prevention and Evaluation specializing in studying and treating teens and young adults at high risk for psychoses, like schizophrenia, preferred to focus on the cultural and social drivers behind these types of killings — such as the romanticization of guns and gun violence — rather than on individual predictors.
In the gruesome attack on October 25th on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul Pelosi, this was carried out by what one refers to as a ‘lone wolf’. He has to date no clear indication that he was a direct instrument of any extremist group. In the past years that I’ve been studying ‘radicalization’ of individuals in both the U.S. and Canada, I have found some common traits and factors for lone wolves. For one, all were male and primarily Caucasian. These individuals had undergone serious problems with their ‘socialization’ when they were young, often demonstrating loner qualities within somewhat dysfunctional family life and having few real close friends. These individuals may be particularly vulnerable to extremist messaging and recruitment strategies. Their social and economic situations tend to lead them to blaming others, tending to be swayed by conspiracy theories, often easily accessed through social media and Web sites run by extremist groups, such as the message board 4chan — a site notorious for extremist discussion. In the case of Paul Pelosi’s attacker, David DePape, he appears to be a near perfect candidate for extremism and radicalization. For over two decades, he has been estranged from members of his family in Powell River, British Columbia, including a twin sister. His stepmother noted that, in his youth, DePape didn’t socialize much at all. He was also lately estranged from his wife and children. According to an initial investigation by the Associated Press, it is reported that he is alleged to have published a series of conspiracy rants online. In recent months, DePape reportedly published hundreds of blog posts sharing memes in support of fringe commentators and far-right personalities. Many of the posts were filled with screeds against Jews, Black people, Democrats, the media and transgender people. In addition, DePape may have had suicidal thoughts in carrying out his attack, something pointed out by the Columbia University in the case of mass school shootings where almost half (45.6%) ended with the perpetrator’s suicide.
There have been numerous studies in both countries trying to get into the minds of such predators and killers, and how they can become radicalized. A criminal investigative psychologist with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), Matthew Logan, asserted in 2015 that many radicalized individuals are misfits of society who cling obsessively to “overvalued ideas” as a way to elevate their sense of self. Jocelyn Bélanger, a professor of psychology at the Université du Québec à Montréal, concluded that when someone feels alienated from society, it is painful. In turn, one of the quickest ways to assuage that pain is to turn to violence and incite fear. She also notes that, while there is a dearth of hard evidence linking mental illness and radicalization, ideology often does play an important role in what drives people to radicalize. Both researchers argue that, while such individuals are usually intolerant of ideas that contradict their own, treatment isn’t out of the question. Providing individuals with vocational training, stable employment, fair treatment and supportive community connections can steer them onto a more productive track.
Given his history, it will be very difficult to argue that David DePape suffered from a serious mental condition causing his vile actions. He apparently had clear motive for the attack and had planned and carried out the attack in a systematic way, fully recognizing the Secret Service security afforded to the Pelosi residence. As in other lone wolf attacks, he proceeded in a deliberate and targeted ego-driven manner in order to achieve the ultimate goal, which, for many, is a “quest for personal significance.”
FROLITICKS 