In recent weeks, some weird things were happening over at the Department of Defence (aka: the Department of War). Most of it had to do with the current Secretary of Defence, one Pete Hegseth. Firstly, all of the military brass was summoned to Washington to be spoken to by Hegseth, and in turn President Trump. This included senior commanding officers stationed on bases outside of the U.S. For what it’s worth, a Zoom call probably would have been adequate for those matters Hegseth raised. Instead of anything of real strategic value, Hegseth went on to criticize the prevalence of “fat” soldiers, sailors and airmen. In addition, he introduced a new requirement that would eliminate the growth of beards by those in the armed forces, calling them “beardos”. Trump then went on about all kinds of unrelated themes, further baffling the commanders sitting motionless and bewildered in the auditorium.
Next, one has the obvious attack on the free press by Hegseth and company. In a 21 page document, a new set of strictures was laid out that immediately drew criticism from news organizations representing those accredited to cover Defence department news. One of its provisions was widely interpreted as requiring reporters to seek prior approval from the government for their coverage. Failure to comply could lead to a revocation of press passes. A deadline was subsequently set and has now been passed. The result is that all the major news outlets, including Fox News and Newsmax, withdrew their journalists from the Pentagon. In short, this move by Hegseth, formerly of Fox News himself, leaves the Defence department without any mainstream media coverage. So much for a “free press”!
In an effort to appease Trump’s irrational claims of “insurrections” in American cities, national guard were deployed to Chicago, Illinois and Portland, Oregon. Trump referred to these cities as “hell holes”, a statement greatly contested by state Governors and the affected mayors. Visual evidence clearly does not support the administration’s claims, and if anything demonstrates the irrationality of the decision. If nothing else, these deployments simply create a greater dangerous possibility of confrontations by locals with the authorities. In both cases, serious crime rates have declined in recent years. Hegseth even replaced some of the national guard members who apparently were somewhat “obese”, as witnessed by broadcast media upon their arrival in the city.
Last but not least, the Pentagon is carrying out a number of drone strikes in International Waters against suspected boats allegedly coming from Venezuela with drugs destined for the U.S. However, MSN just reported that the mother of a fisherman in Trinidad and Tobago says her 26-year-old son was among six people killed Tuesday in the Trump administration’s fifth drone strike on boats off the coast of Venezuela. As yet, there has been no official comment from the Trinidadian government. The U.S. government also has not identified who was on board. Apparently, this is not the first time there have been claims that the strike may have killed non-Venezuelans. Some critics in Congress are now questioning whether such drone strikes are illegal under international laws and why no permission was given by Congress. Once again, Trump has taken it upon himself to initiate these military operations, obviously with the backing of Hegseth.
The above cases are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the use of Defence officials and military personnel and equipment for what can be considered to be nebulous purposes. For this and other reasons, one can certainly ask what the hell is going on at the Department of Defence?