FROLITICKS

Satirical commentary on Canadian and American current political issues

The President Knows Better Than Even His Own Experts on Climate Change!

Under the auspices of the U.S. Global Change Research Program, the Fourth National Climate Assessment Volume II was recently released.  Thirteen American government departments and agencies, from the Agriculture Department to NASA, were part of the committee that compiled the new report.  Like other similar reports, the White House dismissed the congressionally mandated report as inaccurate. However, this expert report may be a little more difficult to ignore given recent environmental disasters that have occurred in the U.S. and elsewhere. Let’s take a quick look at some of the report’s summary conclusions:

  • More frequent and intense extreme weather and climate-related events, as well as changes in average climate conditions, are expected to continue to damage infrastructure, ecosystems, and social systems that provide essential benefits to communities.
  • Regional economies and industries that depend on natural resources and favourable climate conditions, such as agriculture, tourism, and fisheries, are vulnerable to the growing impacts of climate change.
  • Rising air and water temperatures and changes in precipitation are intensifying droughts, increasing heavy downpours, reducing snowpack, and causing declines in surface water quality, with varying impacts across regions.
  • Climate change is also projected to alter the geographic range and distribution of disease-carrying insects and pests, exposing more people to ticks that carry Lyme disease and mosquitoes that transmit viruses such as Zika, West Nile, and dengue, with varying impacts across regions.
  • Climate change has already had observable impacts on biodiversity, ecosystems, and the benefits they provide to society.
  • An aging and deteriorating infrastructure is further stressed by increases in heavy precipitation events, coastal flooding, heat, wildfires, and other extreme events, as well as changes to average pre­cipitation and temperature.
  • Rising water temperatures, ocean acidification, retreating arctic sea ice, sea level rise, high-tide flooding, coastal erosion, higher storm surge, and heavier precipitation events threaten our oceans and coasts.
  • Outdoor recreation, tourist economies, and quality of life reliant on benefits provided by our natural environment will be degraded by the impacts of climate change in many ways.

Scientists have once again demonstrated this past year that much of the impact on climate change is caused by man-made emissions, especially that resulting from older technologies using fuels such as coal and oil for producing energy. These conclusions are obviously at odds with the Trump administration’s pro-fossil-fuels agenda.  What this report illustrates is that the economic consequences of continuing on the administration’s course of action are extremely serious, far outweighing any costs to businesses and the economy as a result of implementing policies in support of promoting green technologies and penalizing emitters of greenhouse-gases.

As it is, we will all have to begin to adapt in the short-term to the existing impact of climate change by upgrading our infrastructures, altering our agricultural production and introducing more green technologies. Climate change is a massive threat to long-term growth, and the most economically efficient way of avoiding it is a wide tax on greenhouse-gas emissions. This will force industries and consumers to reduce emissions over time.  Some people will argue that it may already be too late, forcing us to simply adapt to climate change at great immediate cost to everyone.  However, I would argue that drastic circumstances such as those highlighted in the report call for more drastic measures sooner rather than later — not only regionally but globally.  What we need is real honest leadership and vision, not unreal excuses.  We owe it to future generations.

Leave a comment »

Employers Are Using Technology To Spy On Employees In The Name of Security

Back in 2016, there was an interesting article about American companies using new spy-ware on their employees in the form of special badges that hang around one’s neck on a lanyard. These small gadgets have two microphones doing real-time voice analysis, and each comes with sensors that follow where the employees are in the office and motion detectors to record how much they move.  More recently, Biohax, a Swedish tech firm, disclosed that it is in talks with a number of UK legal and financial services firms to implant workers with human chip devices. Apparently in Sweden, there are already some 4,000 individuals who are chipped, including 85 of the 500 employees at travel operator Tui. As well as restricting access to controlled areas, these microchips could be used to buy food from the canteen, enter the building, and access files or printers.  Needless-to-say, such security-oriented devices have raised major privacy concerns for employees in establishments where they are being introduced.

Employers already have vast quantities of data about their workers. Thanks to the internet, smart IDs, smartphones and the cloud, employers can already check who is looking at a document, when employees are working and whether they might be stealing company files and contacts. The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) will go even further, raising concerns about Orwellian snooping by employers on their workers. Microsoft, the software giant, already offers a programme called MyAnalytics which pulls together data from e-mails, calendars and so on to show employees how they spend their time, how often they are in touch with key contacts and whether they multitask too much.

Most employment contracts in America give employers blanket rights to monitor employees and collect data about them, but few workers are aware of such provisions. Now, some employers are going further, arguing for the need to track every move by employees all in the name of security.  The important question becomes what else they are tracking, including personal information related to mental and physical health issues, family matters and the state of one’s emotions on a particular day.  Some software can even tell whether one is looking for another job.

An additional concern is that there are more companies which now rely on outside firms to collect and crunch employee information. Privacy concerns will increase and employees may feel violated if they do not think they have given their prior consent to sharing their personal data.  It’s one thing to microchip my pet with a locator chip, it’s a completely other issue when an employer does the same for a person.  What does this mean for privacy in the workplace of the future?  Monitoring employees for performance is one thing, but invading their privacy is a totally different matter.  The introduction of such technologies into our personal and work lives is a growing concern.  Begging one to ask whether Big Brother is watching our every move and our state of mind?

Leave a comment »

Right-Wing Extremism Is A Growing Concern In North American Communities

On October 27th of this year, the deadliest attack on Jews in the history of the United States took place at a synagogue in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. This horrendous event is being treated as a hate crime against Jews.  On January 29, 2017, a young male fatally shot six people at a mosque in Quebec City’s Sainte-Foy neighbourhood. This was also seen by authorities as a hate crime against Muslims. In both cases, the shooters were influenced one way or another by right-wing extremism. On August 11, 2018, several Montrealers joined an ultra-right torch march through Charlottesville, Virginia, blending into a crowd that chanted ‘Blood and soil’ and ‘Jews will not replace us’. The participating Canadians were suspected as being connected to a neo-Nazis movement in North America and involved with La Meute, the largest far-right organization in Quebec.

The current Liberal government in Canada is so concerned about the rise in far-right movements in Canada that it has committed to providing $23 million over two years for multicultural programs and cross-country consultations on racism. Moreover, police-reported hate crimes have been on the rise in recent years in both countries.  For example, anti-Semitic incidents rose more than 50 percent in 2017 in the U.S. Hundreds of far-right groups with thousands of active members in Canada and the U.S. have been growing online and offline. Unfortunately, statements by President Trump and the tone set at his campaign rallies have done nothing to discourage the activities of far-right groups who are primarily responsible for hate crimes against Muslims, Jews and migrants.

One of the lasting effects of the violence in Charlottesville was its blow to the far-right’s ability to raise money and spread propaganda online. The follow-up exposure of the Quebec participants revealed their identities, ended up in some losing their jobs and friends, and forced them to drop out of the movement. Anti-fascist groups have also increasingly emerged to demonstrate against ultra-right extremists wherever they appear, sometimes unfortunately resulting in violent confrontations.  The fact is that there is a fine line between protecting ‘free speech’ and preventing ‘hate speech’.

Nevertheless, it would appear that the majority of Americans and Canadians want their governments to take a stronger stance against extremism, no matter what kind. However, the emergence of ultra-right extremism and resulting increases in hate crimes against particular groups have become a major concern for authorities on both sides of the border.  As citizens, we also have to remain vigilant and aware of hate-related activities within our communities.  As evidenced in Charlottesville, Pittsburgh and Quebec City, no community is immune to the influence of militant extremist groups, especially the young and vulnerable. By promoting love, respect and tolerance, each of us must do whatever it takes to address any groups promoting hate in our communities.  We cannot afford to ignore the existence of extremism.

Leave a comment »