FROLITICKS

Satirical commentary on Canadian and American current political issues

It’s Time for American Youth to Stand Up for Gun Control

From the 1930s through the 1960s, Saul Alinsky, a tough, pragmatic American activist and a lover of humanity, pioneered a method of helping poor and working-class people organize themselves to improve their communities, especially in crime-ridden Chicago neighbourhoods. He subsequently wrote a book entitled “Rules for Rebels” which highlighted some of the peaceful but assertive ways which allowed ordinary people to push for social change. He would immerse himself in the neighbourhood, listen to ordinary people’s troubles and needs, assess where power lay, and empower previously divided groups to seek common goals by standing up to government and corporate machines.  After the recent South Florida high school shooting and other mass shootings, you could sure use another Saul Alinsky right now.

Perhaps, just perhaps, this latest school shooting is the straw that broke the camel’s back. It was inspiring to see hundreds, if not thousands of young people organizing to protest against the lack of gun control measures in the U.S. and for changes in the gun culture. They are even planning a huge march on Washington. All of this is very good and nice, except as Alinsky would note, you need to start on-going community-based initiatives to effectively influence state and local authorities.  The youth movement must align itself with existing community and state-wide organizations to develop comprehensive and continuous plans of action.  Local, state and federal politicians have to feel the immediate heat.  The movement must use social and main stream media to get its messages out.  It must organize support wherever possible in upcoming federal and state elections for pro-gun control candidates.  There must be open and effective protest.

Do not fool oneself, for any initiatives will have to be organized on a long-term basis. There is little doubt that the National Rifle Association (NRA) and its supporters, including the arms industry, will throw everything except the kitchen sink into a counter campaign, while increasing lobbying at state and federal levels.  However, if history is any indication, further mass shootings will unfortunately occur in the U.S.  Moreover, these youth represent future leaders who must take a concrete stand against organizations such as the NRA and their appalling past and current influence on federal and state governments.

The issue of gun violence in the U.S. has existed for decades, and it will perhaps take decades to halt the evident trends. Hopefully, there are some Saul Alinskys’ among the youth of today.  Those of us who care, must support their cause and peaceful protest.  Otherwise, these horrendous tragedies will simply repeat themselves, year after year after year.

Leave a comment »

Racism Against Indigenous People Exists In Canada and We Need To Do Something

In August 2016, a farmer shot and killed an unarmed 22 year-old Indigenous man on his Saskatchewan farm and was subsequently charged with second-degree murder. This February, an all-white jury found the accused not guilty in what the farmer claimed was an accidental shooting with a handgun.  Under Saskatchewan’s jury selection system, potential jurors are selected using provincial health care records. However, health care is provided by the federal Health Department to indigenous persons living on reserves, and consequently they wouldn’t have provincial health cards.  During the jury selection process itself and using “peremptory challenges” to block potential jurors, the defence blocked all those summoned jurors who appeared to be Indigenous, whether young or old, male or female — thus the resulting all white jury. This was not a new issue. For example, in 2013 former Supreme Court Justice Frank Iacobucci recommended discussing the possibility of asking the federal government to amend the Criminal Code to prevent the use of peremptory challenges to discriminate against First Nations people. No wonder there was outrage among Indigenous peoples across Canada. After all, justice not only has to be provided under the legal system, but it also has to be seen as being just and fair.

We now have the Federal Government stating that it will undertake a review of the Criminal Code and legal processes across Canada to determine if there are systemic discrimination practices. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has promised to see changes made to the legal system to ensure that the rights of Indigenous people are protected and that the system is more inclusive. Given Canada’s history of racism and today’s policies aimed at reconciliation with First Nations people, changes are urgently needed. According to the most recent findings by Canada’s prison watchdog, while Indigenous people in Canada make-up 4.3 percent of the population, they represent more than 25 percent of inmates. There’s something terribly wrong with this situation.  More has to be done with regard to the lack of trust by Indigenous people with the police — especially the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the courts and the corrections system.

In 2015 in its final report documenting the history and legacy of Canada’s residential school system, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission raised serious concerns for current and future generations of First Nations, Inuit and Métis children. As a growing crisis, the report noted that Indigenous youth are overrepresented in Canada’s prisons and in the child-welfare system. Prime Minister Trudeau is planning to overhaul the way the federal government relates to Indigenous Peoples, proposing a new legislative framework designed to pave the way towards stronger rights and greater control over their own destiny. It’s about time!

Leave a comment »

The “#MeToo” Phenomenon Has Opened the Flood Gates

There is little doubt that claims of sexual harassment in social media have caught the attention of the mainstream media, a number of which are sensational in nature. Now, across the U.S. and Canada, claims of sexual harassment by women and men have been flooding in against politicians, actors, producers, musicians, athletes, trainers, etc., etc. Some claims go back decades, and some are more recent — most frequently involving persons in positions of power. Women in particular have been encouraged by other women and women’s groups to come forward with allegations of past sexual misconduct or assault.  However, in many cases, charges under criminal law have never been laid by the authorities, and often claims were never brought forward by the victims.  Too often, the victims were victimized by the system.  Regularly, it has become a matter of his word against the victim’s word.

Unfortunately, all that one needs to do now is to make accusations via a tweet, e-mail or other social media source. Once out there, such accusations land in the so-called “court of public opinion”.  Moreover, no one has been found guilty in a court of law or accountable by some form of “due process”.  As a result, without further independent investigation, careers can be destroyed and reputations ruined.  Many of the accusations can be found in work-related situations where there may not be any credible, objective and confidential process in place to determine the validity of harassment charges.  Only in recent years have employers been required either by law or through internal policies to institute review processes when harassment claims are made.

However, it appears that both public sector and private sector employers have not been diligent in ensuring that harassment investigation processes are functioning well. Too often, it takes a scandal to become public to bring such inadequacies to the surface.  This situation is no longer acceptable as evidenced by the public’s and shareholders’ outrage.  As well, individuals being openly accused of sexual harassment are being forced to immediately step down from their positions with no access to due process.  As for the alleged victims, one sees increasingly a public “backlash” against some when accusations are simply made through social media without verification as to their validity.  What is now being portrayed as sexual harassment has become so broad that people are beginning to demand greater clarification as to its meaning, and rightly so.

Don’t get me wrong. The fact that the issue of sexual harassment in the workplace has been raised through both social and mainstream media is a good thing.  However, there is obviously a real need for employers to quickly react in positive ways so as to prevent future claims of harassment and to protect employees in their workplaces.  Independent, confidential and just processes must be in place to ensure fairness for both the accuser and the accused.  We’ve seen what happens when unsubstantiated accusations become public.  Indeed, we live in very thorny times.

Leave a comment »