FROLITICKS

Satirical commentary on Canadian and American current political issues

Stephen Harper – the George W. Bush of the North!

OK. We have the Prime Minister of Canada, Stephen Harper, reiterating his government’s hard line on Hamas in Gaza, Russia’s involvement in Ukraine and Chinese cyberattacks on Canadian government computers. Now, no one would blame any Western leader for expressing his or her government’s position with respect to foreign policy. However, if one is going to continuously take such forceful stances in opposition, then you better have the force and accompanying strength to back up your tough words. Such is not the case for Canada.

Unlike some other countries directly affected by recent regional events, Canada has little to loose in taking such a hard line stance. Canada’s dealings with Russia and the Middle East are minimal when compared to the U.S. and the Europeans. Cyberattacks by China and other countries are not all that unusual and more common then we think. Just think of the American spying on many of its own allies, most notably Germany. Maybe Canadian authorities and security agencies aren’t all that innocent as well.

So what does Canada have to back up its harsh words? The military, while very professional and dedicated, is among the smallest in the West in absolute numbers. The military is also dealing with aging and inadequate equipment in all its services, and is totally reliant on NATO to service most missions abroad. The Canadian economy is very reliant on external trade, especially for markets of the country’s natural resources — with 70% of trade still being carried out with the U.S. All said and done, Canada can huff and puff all it wants, but it won’t blow anyone’s house down.

Unless Mr. Harper plans to do standup comedy at Yuk Yuks in Moscow, Beijing or Tel Aviv, he and Foreign Minister John Baird might want to tone down the rhetoric somewhat. Let’s not make Canada’s international reputation suffer any more than it already has. Once, Canada was viewed as a moderate voice on the world scene, ready and trusted to help bring conflicting parties to the table. Canada has lost its non-alignment status which served it so well during the Cold War and past world conflicts. Now it appears that Mr. Harper would like to become the George W. Bush of the North! Needless-to-say, this is no laughing matter.

Leave a comment »

Israel and the Palestinians – A No Win Situation

Well, here we go again! Israeli troops are inside Gaza and Hamas continues to fire its weapons of terror — its somewhat useless rockets — toward most of that country’s major cities. Palestinian militants fired rockets deep into Israel, prompting Israel to resume an offensive aimed at destroying rocket launchers and cross-border attack tunnels used by Hamas. Meanwhile, hundreds of Palestinians are caught in the Israeli onslaught in Gaza resulting in many fatalities and injuries, including women and children. All referred to a collateral damage!

Unfortunately, such outbreaks will not resolve the basic issues surrounding both parties’ positions and political agenda. Gaza remains prison-like whereby Israeli cross-border security controls everything from food, medical supplies, worker movements, etc. Fear of militant attacks on civilian targets remains the prominent theme in Israel. The prime weapon that Hamas has is its ability to target such populations. This represents the pure definition of a no win situation for both adversaries. Unless something drastic changes politically, this intermittent conflict will continue on for years to come. Quiet one year, loud the next.

Meanwhile, the rest of the world sits helplessly by. There is little that the U.S., Canada, the Arab League, United Nations or other interested bodies can do to resolve the conflict. Imposing outside temporary solutions like ceasefires may buy time, but will do nothing to deal with the underlying causes. Only the adversaries have that ability in their own hands. It doesn’t help that outside supporters of the two sides are parading around and fighting in the streets of North American and European cities. While the PR and politics plays out by each side, people are still being killed and injured in the region.

Peace is a nice and bold word which politicians like to use in such circumstances. Former Canadian Prime Minister Lester B. Pearson had exclaimed: “The grim fact is that we prepare for war like precocious giants, and for peace like retarded pygmies.” Remember, he had won the Nobel Peace Prize for helping to establish the use of UN Peacekeepers in regional conflicts. I suspect that he’s rolling over in his grave right about now.

Leave a comment »

Why Are We Acting To Refugees In Such A Belligerent Way?

In recent months, we have seen in both Canada and the U.S. belligerent reactions directed at refugees. In the U.S., some American politicians and citizens have lambasted the Obama administration over the influx of Central American illegal refugees, especially children, across their southern border. White House officials have insisted that extreme poverty and an epidemic of gang violence in certain Central American countries were the main causes of the unanticipated spike in illegal migration. Meanwhile, in Canada, the Supreme Court ruled that recent federal policies to limit the kinds of medical care that refugees would be entitled to were overly cruel and unusual treatment. Indeed, such policies are contrary to Canada’s Charter of Rights. However, recent polls have shown that Canadians, like many Americans, appear to support the tightening up of rules governing the treatment and deportation of illegal refugees.

Whatever happened to the fundamental edict opening our borders up to those persecuted, the ill and the impoverished? Have our values as nations changed that much? Both countries were built on the sweat and hard work of immigrants, including refugees escaping all forms of persecution in other countries and seeking to better their lives and that of their children. Just as a nation is judged by how well it cares for those citizens requiring assistance and the less fortunate, it must also be judged on how it treats outsiders seeking refuge within its borders. The fact that the state may view their entry as legal or illegal does not matter. These refugees are desperate, often taking enormous personal risks to travel to our countries.

The very definition of a refugee is a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution or natural disaster. Today, one can further add conditions attributed to poor economies, drug cartel violence, extreme poverty, lack of affordable medical care, etc. As two of the wealthiest countries in the world, it is only natural that persons would seek refuge in the U.S. and Canada. Until conditions improve in their native countries, the constant influx of refugees, legal or otherwise, will only continue. Simply deporting desperate people and their families is surely not the only answer. Instead of knee jerk reactions, both countries should look at new and more effective internal and external policies to accommodate the needs of these less fortunate.

I know that the majority of Canadians and Americans are much more humane and caring than any polling would show. As societies, we both share similar values when it comes to fairness, equality and openness. Hopefully, we can be more understanding and better demonstrate our humanity by opening our hearts and resources to those who are less fortunate. I know that I will.

Leave a comment »