FROLITICKS

Satirical commentary on Canadian and American current political issues

Why Minimum Wage Still Remains an Important Issue in North America

Here we go again! Controversy has surfaced over discussions in Canada and the U.S. over raising the existing minimum wage levels at the federal, state and provincial levels. In both countries, minimum wages differ among states and provinces. In the U.S., the federal minimum wage is currently $7.25 per hour. In Canada, minimum wages vary among provinces: the highest being in the territory of Nunavut at $11.00 per hour to the lowest in Alberta at $9.75 per hour. The current provincial average rate in Canada is around $10.00. There is no Canadian federal minimum wage for industries under federal jurisdiction, as the federal government has simply adopted provincial minimum wages in its labour standards legislation.

In his February 2013 State of the Union address, President Barack Obama urged Congress to raise the federal minimum wage from $7.25 to $9, saying the move would reduce poverty and stimulate the economy. As usual, critics argue that increasing the minimum wage would raise businesses’ costs and, in turn, reduce the number of employees they could hire. However as noted by the Department of Labor, the federal minimum wage was only $3.35 per hour in 1981. When adjusted for inflation the current federal minimum wage would need to be more than $8 per hour to equal its buying power of the early 1980s, and more than $10 per hour to equal its buying power of the late 1960s.

This brings us to the question of what is a minimum wage and how is it determined? Originally, minimum wages tended to be calculated based on some percentage of the average industrial wage. For example, one may have desired it to be set at 50 or 60 percent of the average industrial wage. Today according to Statistics Canada, the average hourly wage in Canada for persons 15 years and older is $23.75. In the U.S., the average hourly wage in the private sector is around $24.00. However, what has happened over the recent decades has been a lag in minimum wage levels when compared to yearly increases in industrial wages. Indeed, average minimum wages have rarely even kept pace with inflation rates, not being adjusted for the annual cost of inflation increases. Instead, increases in minimum wage rates are dependent on governments to prescribe in law, a process often taking place over the course of several years.

We are now no longer talking about a “living wage”. How can a family of four expect to live comfortably in an urban setting on one income based on a minimum wage? At or slightly above the poverty line, this is why there are so many families with both couples working: often referred to as the “working poor”. With the loss of good paying jobs in manufacturing in particular, the so-called “middle class” is slowing shrinking. Many unemployed persons are forced to seek employment in the retail and services sectors where minimum wages play a much greater role in effectively determining wages.

Moreover, politicians are less likely to be influenced by anti-poverty groups than by industry lobbyists. Recently, members of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) in Canada stated that almost 20 percent of Ontario workers were forced below the poverty line in the three years since the provincial Liberal Government froze the minimum wage at $10.25 per hour. ACORN’s province-wide campaign is calling for the rate to be immediately increased to $14, reflecting the rise in inflation since 2010. A Minimum Wage Advisory Panel, appointed by the Liberals in July 2013, is examining a potential provincial minimum wage increase in 2014. However, one can be certain that industry representatives will once again raise the age-old specter of increased unemployment in those sectors where minimum wages are currently used as base income levels. As in the U.S., it is very unlikely that there will be any significant changes to minimum wage rates in Ontario or in Canada. Perhaps, it’s about time for Ontario to take the lead and ensure that workers are entitled to a real “living wage”.

Leave a comment »

Afghanistan: Good Investment or Sink Hole and Lost Cause

Well, here we are over ten years later and one is still uncertain as to what has been accomplished in Afghanistan. Let’s look at a few facts:

• In 2013, $4.7 billion U.S. is being allocated for the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF), an amount that the U.S. government can’t continue to expend.

• Questions about the ability of the ANSF to provide the necessary security against future Taliban attacks and incursions continue to surface.

• How many American troops will be permanently assigned there after 2014 is still up in the air, and to what effect?

• The State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) have to date never issued a remotely credible report on the progress and impact of the civilian surge or any aspect of the civil aid program.

• Amid complaints of corruption, support among the populace for President Hamid Karzai’s government continues to be weak.

• Beyond Kabul, Afghan warlords are still in control of much of the country, often financed by the ongoing drug trade and American contract monies.

• Support from other NATO countries for the so-called reconstruction phase in Afghanistan is luke warm.

• It appears that any real meaningful negotiations with the Taliban are not likely to happen any time real soon. Especially as the Taliban are patiently awaiting the withdrawal of foreign troops and the level of trust on both sides is extremely low.

• The Taliban are not viewed by locals in the same way as al-Qaeda was, al-Qaeda having all but disappeared from the landscape.

• The Taliban are securely entrenched in Pakistan where the authorities are unable and unwilling to deal with the insurgents.

Have there really been any significant changes within Afghan society over the past ten years? It would appear from recent evidence that the answer is a strong “no”. Recent interviews by journalists of the New York Times with dozens of Afghan youth paint a picture of a new generation bound to their society’s conservative ways; especially when it comes to women’s rights, one of the West’s single most important efforts in the country. Attempts to alter women’s roles in society remain controversial among the younger generation. In addition, many Aghans consider democracy a tool of the West. The vast majority of Afghans still rely on tribal justice, viewing the courts as little more than venues of extortion. There continues to be strong support for adherence to Shariah law in Afghanistan, much of which actually comes from tribal traditions. Afghanistan is still an ancient and poor country with tribal ways, always suspicious of western ways and culture.
What does all this mean? Afghanistan has become a continuous burden to the American taxpayer, a real sink hole. Obama and other western leaders had better get out while they can, and let the Afghans resolve their own issues and employ their own measures. Only then, can they realistically determine their future, whatever that might be. I don’t think that we can afford another ten years of the same.

Leave a comment »