FROLITICKS

Satirical commentary on Canadian and American current political issues

Justin Trudeau’s Speaking Engagements and the Prime Minister’s Office

Well, here we go again. It appears that the taxpayer-funded Prime Minister’s Office (aka PMO) has nothing better to do but to lead a campaign to disparage a Member of Parliament (MP) from one of the opposition parties. Now, one must remember that the powerful PMO is responsible for almost everything to do with the PM, in this case Stephen Harper. In fact, the PMO calls the shots for much of what the Conservative government is doing or saying in the legislature and in public. It is the exclusive operational arm of the executive. Indeed, it appears to have so much influence that even a number of Conservative back benchers have complained about the PMO’s obsession with control.

Among the PMO’s latest activities is the apparent spearheading of partisan attacks against the Liberal leader, Justin Trudeau. Remember that recent polls have shown that Trudeau represents a real potential threat to the ruling Conservatives in the next election, his popularity being even greater than that of the PM. Due to his popularity and charismatic attributes, the younger Trudeau is often invited by various groups to speak at events, including those promoting a charitable cause. As an MP, Trudeau is in his right to be paid for such speaking engagements, as long as they are reported the federal ethics watchdog Mary Dawson. However, the Conservatives have tried to depict his acceptance of speaking fees as being unethical, particularly where charitable organizations are involved. I have no problem with such partisan political meanderings, but please do it on your own dime and not mine.

It appears that the PM and his staff are treating the PMO as an extension of the Conservative Party’s machinery. Recognizing that the PMO is staffed with party cronies, it is however paid for out of the public purse. The PMO’s chief administrative responsibility is to coordinate the ruling party’s agenda in Cabinet and in Parliament and to liaise with the federal bureaucracy. However, the PMO today has become much more as a result of exercising an inordinate amount of control over the Conservative caucus, Cabinet ministers and the party’s members of parliament. This obsession of Stephen Harper with absolute control has exasperated even members of his own party, to the point where one member recently left the caucus to sit as an independent. Under threat of excommunication, MPs are not allowed to speak their own minds or to speak out of turn either in the legislature or in public. Big brother is watching.

Using the PMO to spearhead political attacks on opposition leaders and to deflect recent negative publicity surrounding the Conservative government’s inappropriate behaviour and abuse of powers is unacceptable and dangerous. It’s about time that Canadians wake up to the bastardization of parliamentary institutions by this government. Elected on the promise of greater transparency and accountability, control-freak Harper has demonstrated even more secrecy and lack of openness in his administration. What’s worse is that the other parties may be becoming just as control conscious!!! So much for independence of thought.

Leave a comment »

Arms Trade Treaty – Canada Ready to Shoot Itself in the Foot Once Again

Recently, Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird invoked the country’s former long-gun registry as the Conservative Government refused to say when or even if Canada will sign a treaty aimed at stemming the flow of illegal weapons and ammunition around the world. His argument is that the proposed Arms Trade Treaty, approved by an overwhelming majority of countries in the UN’s General Assembly, would resurrect the long-gun registry “through the backdoor.” Remember, the Conservatives scrapped the national long-gun registry last February, claiming that the registry only hurt law-abiding sportsmen and law-abiding hunters and farmers. This despite the fact that a survey conducted exclusively in October 2010 for Postmedia News and Global Television found that public support for the registry stood at 66 percent nationally. As well, the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police had unanimously endorsed a new national firearms policing strategy and had publicly pushed the need for the National Firearms Registry.

While this became Canada’s national policy, the proposed Treaty has nothing to do with domestic gun owners’ rights. Even U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry has stated that the Treaty will not undermine the legitimate international trade in conventional weapons, interfere with national sovereignty or infringe on the rights of American citizens, including Second Amendment rights. It is designed to prevent the illegitimate arms trade, particularly as it affects third world countries. However, should the U.S. administration sign the Treaty, it will still have to be ratified by Congress. Good luck!!!

Meanwhile, the current Canadian government openly fought the proposed Treaty as it now stands. This despite the fact that the previous Liberal government had been a strong proponent of the Treaty during preliminary discussions at the U.N. Ridiculously, the Conservatives are even pushing for language in the Treaty’s preamble affirming “respect” for the lawful ownership of firearms by private citizens. Specifically, Canada has asked that the treaty recognize the use of “firearms for recreational purposes, such as sport shooting, hunting and other similar forms of lawful activities.” Moreover, Canada today stands out as one of only a few countries — including Israel — pushing for recognition in the Treaty of lawful public ownership and recreational use of firearms.

Last March, newly released documents showed that Canadian officials had been instructed by Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s government to “play a low-key, minimal role” — and that their main objective was safeguarding Canadian gun owners’ rights. Now, what does this have to do with the illegal international trade in small guns and ammunition? Let’s face it, we’re not talking about hunting rifles here. The Treaty is all about trying to come to grips with the on-going trade in military-type weaponry. The landmark Arms Trade Treaty approved by the General Assembly on April 2, 2013, is aimed at regulating the international trade in conventional arms, from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships. Yes, it would include the tracking by ratifying countries of all arms trade, including that from Canada. How such tracking provides any potential “backdoor” resurrection of a domestic long-gun registry is anyone’s guess!! Sorry, Canada. You may have just left the “front door” wide open to cries of hypocrisy and subsequent further international alienation. On this one, you’re up the proverbial creek in the eyes of your allies. For shame, for shame.

Leave a comment »